Signs of cheating: The editor’s thoughts

Authors

  • Boris Naimushin
  • Stanislav Bogdanov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33919/flcy.20-21.3.11

Keywords:

editor, scholarly journal, academic writing, plagiarism, research ethics, peer review

Abstract

The paper addresses some ethical issues that prevent a number of research articles received by the English Studies at NBU editorial office of the Department of Foreign Languages and Cultures from passing initial editorial approval and from going on to the actual peer review stage. These problems include a large number of authors and false authorship, and plagiarism and self-plagiarism, including translation. These signs alert editors to possible ethical violations. The article will be useful for both young science editors and young researchers.

References

Василева & чанкова 2019: Vassileva, I, & Chankova,M. (2019). Attitudes towards plagiarism in academia. English Studies at NBU, 5(1), 135–163. https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.19.1.7

Янкова 2020: Yankova, D. (2020). On Translated Plagiarism in Academic Discourse. English Studies at NBU,6(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.20.2.1

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Naimushin, B., & Bogdanov, S. (2021). Signs of cheating: The editor’s thoughts. Yearbook of the Department of Foreign Languages and Cultures, 3, 179–184. https://doi.org/10.33919/flcy.20-21.3.11