Reflections on the Relation between National Cultures and Innovations in Education - the case of Bulgaria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.16.2.2Keywords:
education, culture, cultural dimensions, autonomy, multiculturalismAbstract
Pluralism, multiculturalism, leaner autonomy and motivation have become buzz expressions discussed widely both by the Common European Framework of Reference and the European Centre for Modern Languages. However, despite the hard work to implement these new approaches in the classroom, some countries seem to be more adaptive compared to others. In the author’s opinion, the answer is rooted in the specifics of national cultures. The article discusses the roles of teacher and student as an archetypal case of micro social organization as they reveal typical patterns of social behaviour. Provided is a detailed description of the specifics of the Bulgarian national culture along the six dimensions of Hofstede’s theory of organizations and cultures with regard to the educational system. The readiness of the Bulgarian teachers and students to comply with the concepts of pluralistic approaches, multiculturalism, learner–centred teaching and autonomy in the Bulgarian classroom are explored. The general conclusion is that these ideas are highly culture-sensitive and the success of their implementation depends on the closeness of the cultures where they emerged and the recipient countries to which they are exported.
References
Banks, J. A. (2010). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In Banks, J. A., & Banks, J. A. (Eds.). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (pp. 3-31) (7th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
Benson, P. (2006). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40, 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958
Boyadzhieva, E. (2014a). Pluralistic Approaches in Education: Culture Related Issues. In Bereshova, J. & Suhanyova, Z. (Eds.). Pluralistic Approaches to Languages and Cultures in Education Conference proceedings, 26-27 November 2014, Smolenice. Trnava: Trnava University, pp. 35–48.
Boyadzhieva, E. (2014b) Theory and Practice in Foreign Language Teaching — Past and Present. Journal of Modern Education Review, 4(10), 776–788. https://doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/10.04.2014/006
Boyadzhieva, E. (2014c). The Teacher Role and Learner Autonomy – Some Issues of Contention. Godishnik na filologicheskia facultet 12 [Yearbook of the philological faculty 12], Blagoevgrad: South-West University Publishing house, 60–68.
Boyadzhieva E. (2015a). Global Trends in Education: Issues of Contention. [Ezikov sviat – Orbis Linguarum, 13(1)], Blagoevgrad: South-West University Publishing house, 16-25.
Boyadzhieva E. (2015b). Modern Trends in Education and National Cultures. Journal of the Department of Foreign Languages of Romanian-American University, 6(1), 131-139.
Boyadzhieva E. (2016a). Learner-Centered Teaching and Learner Autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.008
Boyadzhieva E. (2016b). Reflections on Learner autonomy: Cultural perspectives. International Scientific and Practical Conference “World Science†4(2), 11-14. Retrieved from http://ws-conference.com/archive/302.pdf
Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation: A literature review. System 23(2), 165–174.
Fullinwider, R. K. (2003) Multicultural Education, In R. Curren (Ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Education, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK. pp. 487-500, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996454.ch35.
Gardner, H. (2004). Changing minds. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Gerhart B. & Fang M. (2005). National culture and Human Resource Management: Assumptions and Evidence, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(6), 971–986.
Hofstede Home page. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://geert-hofstede.com/bulgaria.html
Hofstede Homepage – Bulgaria. (n. d.). Retrieved from https://geert-hofstede.com/bulgaria.html
Hofstede, G. (2009). Geert Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions. Retrieved from http://www.geert-hofstede.com
Hofstede, G. , Hofstede, G. J., Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill USA.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon. (First published 1979), Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Inglehart R. F. & Norris, P. (2009). Cosmopolitan Communications: Cultural Diversity in a Globalized World. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Khatri, N. (2009). Consequences of Power Distance Orientation in Organisations. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/097226290901300101
Little, D., Ridley, J. & Ushioda, E. (2002). Towards greater learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom. Dublin: Authentik.
McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s Identification of National Culture Differences – A Triumph of Faith a Failure of Analysis, Human Relations, 55(1), 89–188.
Melting pot. (n. d.). Merriam-Webster On-line Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/melting%20pot
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, & G. Eva (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally - lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 169-204). London: Sage.
Shy. (n. d.). Dictionary on-line. Retrieved from http://www.dictionary.com/browse/shy
Venaik, S. & Brewer, P. (2013). Critical issues in the Hofstede and GLOBE national culture models, International Marketing Review, 30(5), 469-482. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-03-2013-0058
World Values Survey. (n.d.).Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All published articles in the ESNBU are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don't have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
In other words, under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license users are free to:
Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
Attribution (by) - All CC licenses require that others who use your work in any way must give you credit the way you request, but not in a way that suggests you endorse them or their use. If they want to use your work without giving you credit or for endorsement purposes, they must get your permission first.
NonCommercial (nc) - You let others copy, distribute, display, perform, and modify and use your work for any purpose other than commercially unless they get your permission first.
If the article is to be used for commercial purposes, we suggest authors be contacted by email.
If the law requires that the article be published in the public domain, authors will notify ESNBU at the time of submission, and in such cases the article shall be released under the Creative Commons 1 Public Domain Dedication waiver CC0 1.0 Universal.
Copyright
Copyright for articles published in ESNBU are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. Authors retain full publishing rights and are encouraged to upload their work to institutional repositories, social academic networking sites, etc. ESNBU is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Exceptions to copyright policy
Occasionally ESNBU may co-publish articles jointly with other publishers, and different licensing conditions may then apply.
