Rethinking Inversion in English Syntax
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.18.1.3Keywords:
inversion, insertion, operator, operator fronting, visibilityAbstract
The article deals with some internal theoretical controversies in the concept and the use of the term inversion in English syntax as used in some descriptive and most pedagogical grammars of Modern English. The analysis focuses mainly on the formation of interrogative and emphatic negative structures in English by applying some basic concepts of generative grammar. The aim of the analysis is to explain the transposition of the subject and the verbal predicate by following the Occam Razor' s principle of scientific description requiring the employment of a minimal number of principles and technicalities in the course of analysis which results in higher explanatory adequacy. This aim is achieved through the application of the terms operator and operator fronting in the cases of both obligatory and reversive inversion. The obligatory visualization of the operator in a series of syntactic structures is also discussed and a general rule is formulated.
References
Camus, L. (2018). Inversion with negative adverbials. Retrieved from https://www.tolearnenglish.com/exercises/exercise-english-2/exercise-english-88760.php
Carter R. &. McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English. A Comprehensive Guide. Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky. N. (1964). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. In Fodor, J. & Katz, J. (Eds.), The Structure of Language (pp. 50-118). Prentice Hall.
Crystal D. (1999 [1994]). The Penguin Dictionary of Language. 2nd Edition. Penguin Books.
Deep structure. (2014). In Collins English Dictionary. Complete and Unabridged, 12th Edition 2014. Retrieved from https://www.thefreedictionary.com/deep+structure
Deep structure. (2016). In Oxford Dictionary On-line. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/deep_structure
Edmonds J. L. (1976). A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Horner, D. (2014, June 12). Inversion of Negative Adverbials. Retrieved from https://www.hornerschool.com/inversion-negative-adverbials
Inversion (linguistics). (n.d.). Retrieved January 15, 2018, from Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inversion_(linguistics)
Inversion. (n.d. a). In Cambridge Dictionary On-line. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/word-order-and-focus/inversion
Inversion. (n.d. b). In Meriam Webster Dictionary On-line. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inversion
Jacobs R. (1993). English Syntax. A Grammar for English Language Professionals. Oxford University Press.
Jespersen O. (1924 [1992]). The Philosophy of Grammar, 1924. The University of Chicago Press.
Kaye, S. (n.d.). William of Ockham. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/ockham/#H2
Lyons J. (1968). Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Nordquist, R. (April 3, 2017). "Fronting (grammar)." ThoughtCo, Retrieved from http://www.thoughtco.com/fronting-in-grammar-1690875.
Perfect English Grammar. (n.d.). Inversion. Retrieved from http://www.perfect-english-grammar.com/inversion.html
Rizzi, L. (2016). The Concept of Explanatory Adequacy. In: Roberts, I. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
Spade, P. V. & Panaccio, C. (2016). William of Ockham. In Zalta E.N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Winter 2016 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/ockham/
Swan M. (1994). Practical English Usage. Oxford University Press.
Swan M. (2005). Practical English Usage. Third edition. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All published articles in the ESNBU are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don't have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
In other words, under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license users are free to:
Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
Attribution (by) - All CC licenses require that others who use your work in any way must give you credit the way you request, but not in a way that suggests you endorse them or their use. If they want to use your work without giving you credit or for endorsement purposes, they must get your permission first.
NonCommercial (nc) - You let others copy, distribute, display, perform, and modify and use your work for any purpose other than commercially unless they get your permission first.
If the article is to be used for commercial purposes, we suggest authors be contacted by email.
If the law requires that the article be published in the public domain, authors will notify ESNBU at the time of submission, and in such cases the article shall be released under the Creative Commons 1 Public Domain Dedication waiver CC0 1.0 Universal.
Copyright
Copyright for articles published in ESNBU are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. Authors retain full publishing rights and are encouraged to upload their work to institutional repositories, social academic networking sites, etc. ESNBU is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Exceptions to copyright policy
Occasionally ESNBU may co-publish articles jointly with other publishers, and different licensing conditions may then apply.
