Nature and specifics in the recognition of faces and objects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33919/ljnbu.22.1.3Keywords:
Identification, collection of evidence, investigative versions, methods of proof, witnessesAbstract
Identification of persons is a method of collecting and verifying evidence, which establishes the identity between the persons presented for identification and those who are claimed in the testimony of the identifier. The main purpose of the identification is the collection of evidence and verification of existing ones, which can be done through the formed investigative versions. The identification, along with the inspection, search, seizure and investigative experiment as means of proof in criminal proceedings, is carried out in the presence of witnesses.
References
Вучков, В. (2015). Образуване на досъдебно производство. София: Сиби.
Колева, С. (2010). Способи за доказване. В: Практическо помагало на съдебния заседател [онлайн]. Добрич: Добрички окръжен съд/фондация „Фридрих Еберт“, 62–63 [прегледан на 10.03.2022]. Достъпен на: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/sofia/07780.pdf.
Костадинов, В. (2019). Поемни лица или доверие и отговорност към разследващите органи. Механика. Транспорт. Комуникации [онлайн], т. 17, бр. 1, 6–10 [прегледан на 15.03.2022]. Достъпен на: https://mtc-aj.com/article.1741.htm/.
Кръстева, З. (2018). Разпознаването в наказателното производство в светлината на съвременните постижения на когнитивната психология. В: Съвременни предизвикателства пред наказателното законодателство. София: УИ „Св. Климент Охридски“, 6–7.
Манев, Н. (2016). Наказателнопроцесуално право. Ръководство за студенти. София: Сиела.
Петрова, Д. (2010). Предмет и тежест на доказване в съдебното производство и доказателствени средства. В: Практическо помагало на съдебния заседател [онлайн]. Добрич: Добрички окръжен съд/фондация „Фридрих Еберт“ [прегледан на 10.03.2022]. Достъпен на: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/sofia/07780.pdf.
Павлов, С. (1996). Наказателен процес на Република България. Обща част. София: Сиби.
Пенев, Й. (2007). Поемните лица и оперативно-издирвателната дейност. МВР// Бюлетин [онлайн], бр. 36, 7 [прегледан на 14.03.2022]. Достъпен на: https://www.mvr.bg/docs/librariesprovider61/ecd91bfc-buletin36policiqpdf.pdf/.
Попниколов, Х. (2017). Функциониране на психичната защитна доминантна на обвиняемия при провеждане на разпит в рамките на наказателния процес. Knowledge International Journal, vol. 28.6, 2143.
Anderson, A. (2015). Wrongful Convictions and the Avenues of Redress: the Post-conviction Review Process in Canada. Appeal. Review of Current Law and Law Reform [online], 20(20), 5 [viewed 16.03.2022]. Available from: https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/appeal/article/view/13591.
Kassin, S. A. Tubb, H. Hosch, A. Memon (2001). On the General Acceptance of Eyewitness Testimony Research: A New Survey of the Experts. American Psychologist [online], 56(5), 405–416 [viewed 21.03.2022]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11983285_On_the_General_Acceptance_of_Eyewitness_Testimony_Research_A_New_Survey_of_the_Experts.
Luis, S. & T. Ryan (2018). United States of Amnesia: Rescuing Memory Loss from Diverse Conditions. Disease Models & Mechanisms [online], 11(5) [viewed 14.03.2022]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992608/.
Megreya, A., M. Bindemann (2013). Individual Differences in Personality and Face Ientification. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology [online], 25(1), 30–37 [viewed 23.03.2022]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235953870_Individual_differences_in_personality_and_face_identification.
Pardini, D. & M. Phillips (2010). Neural Responses to Emotional and Neutral Facial Expressionsin Chronically Violent Men. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience [online], 35(6), 390–398 [viewed 14.03.2022]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964369/
Reno, J., R. Fisher, L. Robinson, N. Brennan, J. Travis (1999). Eyewitness Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement. U.S. Department of Justice [online] [viewed 22. 03.2022]. Available from: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/178240.pdf.
Shaw, J. (2020). Do False Memories Look Real? Evidence That People Struggle to Identify Rich False Memories of Committing Crime and Other Emotional Events. Frontiers in Psychology [online], 11, 650–650 [viewed 14.03.2022]. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00650/full.
Sim, E. M. Harpaintner, M. Kiefer (2020). Is Subliminal Face Processing Modulated by Attentional Task Sets? Evidence from Masked Priming Effects in a Gender Decision Task. Open Psychology [online], 2(1), 76–89 [viewed 14.03.2022]. Available from: https://www.degruyter.com › doi › psych-2020-0006 › pdf.
Werner, N., S. Kühnel & H. Markowitsch (2013). The Neuroscience of Face Processing and Identification in Eyewitnesses and Offenders. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience [online], 7, 189 [viewed 24.03.2022]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853647/.
West, R., K. Stone (2013). Age Differences in Eyewitness Memory for a Realistic Event. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences [online], 69(3), 338–347 [viewed 22.03.2022]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236083514_Age_Differences_in_Eyewitness_Memory_for_a_Realistic_Event.
