Problems of AI Regulation: Solutions Through Soft Law

Authors

  • Daniel Danov University of National and World Economy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33919/ljnbu.26.1.7

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, case law, legal regulation, soft law, hard law

Abstract

This article examines the regulatory challenges arising from the dynamic development of artificial intelligence (AI) and the possibilities for overcoming them through soft law instruments. Traditional legislative mechanisms (hard law) often prove insufficiently flexible and lag behind dynamic technological innovations, leading to legal uncertainty, conflicting case law, and even a lack of legal regulation. This research aims to explore the limits of positive legal regulation (hard law) in the context of accelerated technological development. The article argues that in the field of AI regulation, soft law should not be viewed as a temporary stage before the emergence of hard law, but as a sustainable form of rapid and responsible legal regulation. Particular attention is paid to contemporary judicial practice, which increasingly faces complex cases related to liability for autonomous systems, algorithmic discrimination, and copyright. The study concludes that courts are experiencing difficulties in applying existing legal norms to new legal facts arising from AI. The results of the study confirm, based on an analysis of case law and a comparative legal analysis of soft law instruments and hard law, that in the regulation of AI, soft law should not be viewed merely as a temporary solution, but as a sustainable model for regulation and an important auxiliary tool for judicial interpretation. Particular attention is paid to the mechanisms for strengthening soft law. This justifies a balanced approach to legal regulation of AI, ensuring the protection of fundamental rights and ethical standards while providing the necessary freedom for the development of new technologies.

References

Регламент (ЕС) 2024/1689 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 13 юни 2024 г. за установяване на хармонизирани правила относно изкуствения интелект и за изменение на регламенти (ЕО) № 300/2008, (ЕС) № 167/2013, (ЕС) № 168/2013, (ЕС) 2018/858, (ЕС) 2018/1139 и (ЕС) 2019/2144 и директиви 2014/90/ЕС, (ЕС) 2016/797 и (ЕС) 2020/1828 (Акт за изкуствения интелект), OВ L 2024/1689. Официален вестник на Европейския съюз [онлайн], 12.07.2024 [прегледан на 9.03.2026]. Достъпен на: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/BG/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L_202401689.

AI Principles (2026) [online] [viewed 19.02.2026]. Available from: https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles.

Chang, C. C. (2025). The First Global AI Treaty: Analyzing the Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and the EU AI Act. SSRN [online], 13 February 2025 [viewed 21.03.2026]. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5069335.

Council of Europe (2020). Recommendation CM/Rec(2020)1 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the Human Rights Impacts of Algorithmic Systems. Council of Europe [online], adopted 8 April 2020 [viewed 21.03.2026]. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/09000016809e1154.

Council of Europe (2024). Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225). Council of Europe [online], adopted 17 May 2024 [viewed 21.03.2026]. Available from: https://edoc.coe.int/en/artificial-intelligence/11926-council-of-europe-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence-and-human-rights-democracy-and-the-rule-of-law.html.

European Commission (2020). White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: A European Approach to Excellence and Trust. European Commission [online], 19 February 2020 [viewed 21.03.2026]. Available from: https://op.europa.eu/bg/publication-detail/-/publication/ac957f13-53c6-11ea-aece-01aa75ed71a1.

European Commission (2023). Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems. European Commission [online], 30 October 2023 [viewed 21.03.2026]. Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/bg/library/hiroshima-process-international-code-conduct-advanced-ai-systems.

European Commission (2023). Hiroshima Process International Guiding Principles for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems. European Commission [online], 30 October 2023 [viewed 21.03.2026]. Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/bg/library/hiroshima-process-international-guiding-principles-advanced-ai-system.

European Commission, High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2019). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. European Commission [online], 8 April 2019 [viewed 21.03.2026]. Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/bg/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.

European Commission, High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2020). Assessment List for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (ALTAI) for Self-assessment. European Commission [online], 17 July 2020 [viewed 21.03.2026]. Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/assessment-list-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence-altai-self-assessment.

European Parliament (2026). Recommendation on the Draft Council Decision on the Conclusion, on Behalf of the European Union, of the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (A10-0007/2026). European Parliament [online], 2 February 2026 [viewed 21.03.2026]. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0007_BG.html.

Lessig, L. (1999). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace [online]. New York: Basic Books [viewed 11.04.2026]. Available from: https://lessig.org/images/resources/1999-Code.pdf.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD/LEGAL/0449. OECD [online], adopted 22.05.2019 (amended 2023) [viewed 21.03.2026]. Available from: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). What is AI? Can You Make a Clear Distinction between AI and Non-AI Systems? OECD.AI [online] [viewed 9.03.2026]. Available from: https://oecd.ai/en/wonk/definition.

Pokrovskaya, A. (2025). The Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence: The Need to Form a Legal Personality and Regulate Copyright. Artificial Intelligence and Applications [online], vol. 3(2), 179–191 [viewed 9.03.2026]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAIA52023901.

Pound, R. (1954). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law [online]. New Haven: Yale University Press [viewed 21.04.2026]. Available from: https://ia601604.us.archive.org/34/items/anintroductionto00pounuoft/anintroductionto00pounuoft.pdf.

Szwedo, P. (2015). Global Administrative Law through the Polish Lens. International Journal of Constitutional Law [online], 13(1), 156–178 [viewed 13.04.2026]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/13/1/156/689886.

The White House (2026). National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence: Legislative Recommendations. The White House [online], 20 March 2026 [viewed 21.03.2026]. Available from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/03.20.26-National-Policy-Framework-for-Artificial-Intelligence-Legislative-Recommendations.pdf.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO [online], adopted November 2021 [viewed 21.03.2026]. Available from: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence.

Wagner, B. (2018). Ethics as an Escape from Regulation: From Ethics-Washing to Ethics-Shopping? [online]. Amsterdam University Press [viewed 11.04.2026]. Available from: https://d-nb.info/1239614373/34.

Downloads

Published

28.07.2026

How to Cite

Danov, D. (2026). Problems of AI Regulation: Solutions Through Soft Law. Law Journal of New Bulgarian University, 22(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.33919/ljnbu.26.1.7