The Sixth Amendment Through the Lens of the Constitutional Moment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33919/ljnbu.24.2.7Keywords:
amendment, assembly, constitution, government, judiciary, prosecutor, reform, rule of lawAbstract
The article examines the amendments of the Constitution of Republic of Bulgaria, adopted under the Law on Amendments and Supplements to the Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria, published in the State Gazette, issue no. 106, dated 22.12.2023, within the context of the complex process of adoption and amendment. The development of the constitutional framework and the practice of institutions such as the caretaker government and the judiciary are discussed in light of the “constitutional moment” concept introduced by American scholar Bruce Ackerman. It pertains to historical junctures necessitating constitutional change due to conflicts or inadequacies in the existing order. The article delineates two primary issues: the limitation of presidential powers during political crises and reform of the judiciary. It restricts the president’s powers in appointing a caretaker government and strengthens parliamentary oversight, which reinforces the parliamentary nature of governance. The second part focuses on issues within the judiciary, emphasizing the need for independence and accountability of the judicial branch and the prosecutor general. The article also examines Constitutional Court Decision No. 13 of July 26, 2024, on Constitutional Case No. 1 of 2024, noting that the sixth amendment represents a partial success in judicial reform while underscoring the need for ongoing efforts to achieve a stable rule-of-law-based and democratic state.
References
Ананиева, Н., (2014) Конституцията от 1991 г. и незавършената революция, София: Университетско издателство „Св. Климент Охридски“
Близнашки, Г. (2001) – Върху теорията и историята на учредителната власт, Юридически свят кн. 1
Киров, П., (2004), Президентът в българския конституционен модел, София, Сиби
Михайлова, Е., (2012), Парламентаризъм и правова държава в България, София: Издателство на Нов български университет
Пенев, П., (2014) – Съдебната власт в България 1989 – 2014 проблеми на съвременния дискурс, София: Сиби
Рибарева, И., В. Николова съст., (2000) „Протестът на 39-те“, София
Стойчев, Ст., (2002), Конституционно право, пето допълнено издание, София: Сиела
Танчев, Е., (2003) Въведение в конституционното право, София: Сиби
Ackerman, B. (1991) We the People: 1 Foundations, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
András Sajó – Constitution without the Constitutional Moment: A View from the New Member States, 3 INT’L J. Const. L. (I • CON) 243 (2005)
Barber, S. A., (2014) Constitutional Failure, Lawrence, Kansas, USA: University Press of Kansas
Elster, J., Claus Offe and others (1998), Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies, UK: Cambridge University Press
Tushnet, M., (2005) Misleading Metaphors: Comparative Constitutionalism: Moments and Enthusiasm, 3 INT’L J. Const. L. (I • CON)
Walker, N. et al., eds. (2004). After the Constitutional Moment: in A Constitution for the European Union: first comments on the 2003 draft of the European convention, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, available from www.fedtrust.co.uk/uploads/constitution/32_03.pdf
Walker, N., (2020) – The Legacy of Europe’s Constitutional Moment, 11 Constellations 368, available from https://tinyurl.com/3hc6ntz7
Opinion on the draft amendments to the constitution Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 136th Plenary Session (Venice, 6-7 October 2023), p. 25, достъпно на Venice Commission :: Council of Europe (coe.int)
