Incredulity toward Heroism: Ackroyd as a Gallant Storyteller against the Heroic Tradition

Nazan Yıldız

doi:10.33919/esnbu.23.2.4

Incredulity toward Heroism: Ackroyd as a Gallant Storyteller against the Heroic Tradition

Authors

Nazan Yıldız Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Türkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.23.2.4

Keywords:

Peter Ackroyd, The Fall of Troy, postmodernism, heroism, metanarrative, parody

Abstract

Heroism as an unremitting subject conquers and even haunts literature as well as history. Historical and fictitious heroes are guiding spirits of human beings regardless of time and geography. Historians and writers have so sternly adhered to the ideals of heroism that this fascination has been transformed into hero worship dating back to antiquity, bringing heroism to the forefront as a metanarrative in history and literature. Particularly contributing to the undying predicament of literature caught between the ideal and the real, causes of heroism have been largely left unquestioned putting heroes in the shoes of a messiah. Peter Ackroyd (1949-), renowned for his historiographic metafictions fashioned within postmodernism, dares to challenge this unimpeached -ism in The Fall of Troy (2006). In the novel, Ackroyd rewrites the history of Troy and introduces an eccentric half-real hero, Heinrich Obermann, against celebrated heroes of history and literature. Accordingly, this paper reads heroism as a metanarrative and delineates how Ackroyd sketches an atypical hero by acting contrary to traditional heroism and heroic literary tradition in his vibrant postmodern parody, The Fall of Troy.

Author Biography

Nazan Yıldız, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Türkiye

Nazan Yıldız is an Associate Professor in the Department of English Language and Literature at Karadeniz Technical University, Türkiye. She holds a PhD in English literature from Hacettepe University, Türkiye (2015), and a certificate in critical thinking skills from the American English Institute, University of Oregon. Her main areas of interest are Medieval English Literature, Chaucer, Old English Literature, the English Novel, Gender Studies, and Critical Thinking and Literature.

References

Ackroyd, P. (2007). The Fall of Troy. Vintage Books.

Antakyalıoğlu. Z. (2009). Peter Ackroyd’s Chatterton: History as Taxidermy. Çankaya University Journal of Arts and Sciences, 12, 19-30.

Campbell, J. (1949). The Hero with A Thousand Faces. Princeton University Press.

Eco, U. (2004). On Beauty: A History of a Western Idea. Secker & Warburg.

Federman, R. (1993). Critifiction: Postmodern Essays. State University of New York Press.

Fernando, S. (2006, 14 July). The Question: Why are Funeral Pyres Illegal? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/g2/story/0,,1820024,00.html

Finney, B. (1992). Peter Ackroyd, Postmodernist Play and Chatterton. Twentieth Century Literature, 38(2), 240-261. https://doi.org/10.2307/441621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/441621

Gaisford, S. (2006, 17 September). The Fall of Troy by Peter Ackroyd: Dirty Diggers on the Trail of Helen's Gold. https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/the-fall-of-troy-by-peter-ackroyd-416165.html

Gash, H. & Conway, P. (1997). Images of Heroes and Heroines: How Stable? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18, 349-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(97)80005-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(97)80005-6

Greenblatt, S. (Ed.). (2006). The Norton Anthology of English Literature (pp. 29-100). W. W. Norton & Company.

Homer. (2002). The Iliad and The Odyssey (G. Chapman. Trans.). Wordsworth Editions Limited.

Houghton, W. E. (1954). The Victorian Frame of Mind 1830-1870. Yale University Press.

Hutcheon, L. (1988). A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. Routledge.

Hutcheon, L. (1988). Critical Discourse: Problematizing History. English Studies in Canada, 14(4), 365-382. https://doi.org/10.1353/esc.1988.0057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/esc.1988.0057

Hynes, S. (1997). The Soldiers’ Tale: Bearing Witness to Modern War. Penguin Books.

Klein, H. & Shiffman, K. S. (2006). Messages about Physical Attractiveness in Animated Cartoons. Body Image, 3, 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.08.001

Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1772278

Oppermann, S. (2006). Postmodern Tarih Kuramı: Tarih Yazımı, Yeni Tarihselcilik ve Roman. Phoenix Publishing.

Ousby, I. (1982). Carlyle, Thackeray, and Victorian Heroism. The Yearbook of English Studies, 12, 152-168. https://doi.org/10.2307/3507403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3507403

Parker, R. (2001). Greek Religion. In Boardman, J., Griffin, J. & Murray, O. (Eds.), The Oxford History of Greece and the Hellenistic World (pp. 306-330). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192801371.003.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192801371.003.0012

Parsons, G. (2010). Historians and the First World War. Australian Quarterly, 82, 37-39.

Steckmesser, K. L. (1997). The Western Hero: In History and Legend. University of Oklahoma Press.

Thackeray, W. M. (1998). Vanity Fair. Wordsworth Editions Limited.

White, H. (1987). The Content of the Form. The John Hopkins University Press.

Yazıcı, M. (2010). Turkish Versions of to the Lighthouse from the Perspective of Modernism. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 18(1), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09076761003624027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09076761003624027

Downloads

Published

2023-12-20

How to Cite

Yıldız, N. (2023). Incredulity toward Heroism: Ackroyd as a Gallant Storyteller against the Heroic Tradition. English Studies at NBU, 9(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.23.2.4

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

All published articles in the ESNBU are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don't have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

In other words, under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license users are free to:
Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material

Under the following terms:

Attribution (by) - All CC licenses require that others who use your work in any way must give you credit the way you request, but not in a way that suggests you endorse them or their use. If they want to use your work without giving you credit or for endorsement purposes, they must get your permission first.

NonCommercial (nc) - You let others copy, distribute, display, perform, and modify and use your work for any purpose other than commercially unless they get your permission first.

If the article is to be used for commercial purposes, we suggest authors be contacted by email.

If the law requires that the article be published in the public domain, authors will notify ESNBU at the time of submission, and in such cases the article shall be released under the Creative Commons 1 Public Domain Dedication waiver CC0 1.0 Universal.

Copyright

Copyright for articles published in ESNBU are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. Authors retain full publishing rights and are encouraged to upload their work to institutional repositories, social academic networking sites, etc. ESNBU is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.

Exceptions to copyright policy

Occasionally ESNBU may co-publish articles jointly with other publishers, and different licensing conditions may then apply.