Disciplinary Variations in Framing Research Articles in the Social Sciences and Humanities


  • Fatma Yuvayapan Kahramanmaraş Istiklal University, Türkiye
  • Ilyas Yakut Kahramanmaraş Istiklal University, Türkiye




academic writing, metadiscourse, frame markers, research articles, social sciences


Metadiscourse is now a widely used term in academic discourse analysis. How academics employ rhetorical devices to structure their texts, establish reader-writer interaction and stamp their authorial stance regarding the conventions of the disciplines, cultures, and genres has been the subject of many studies. Despite the growing prominence of the term, however, some features of it, one of which is frame markers, have gone unnoticed. Frame markers signal the boundaries in the academic discourse for the readers' understanding, and they are a crucial rhetorical feature of metadiscourse. The present study examines the deployment of frame markers in research articles written between 2010 and 2019. Based on the analysis of frame markers in a corpus of research articles across four disciplines in social sciences, there were marked variations across the four disciplines in the use of frame markers and the occurrences of their sub-categories. The findings suggested that academic communities have a decisive role in constructing text structures in research articles. The results might offer guidance to academic writers on shaping the texts that their readers find persuasive.

Author Biographies

Fatma Yuvayapan, Kahramanmaraş Istiklal University, Türkiye

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Fatma Yuvayapan works in the Department of Translation and Interpreting at Kahramanmaraş Istiklal University, Türkiye. She has studies on English language teaching, academic writing, i.e. metadiscourse, pragmatics, and corpus linguistics. She earned her MA in professional development and held a Ph.D. degree in corpus linguistics with a specific reference to academic writing.

Ilyas Yakut, Kahramanmaraş Istiklal University, Türkiye

Assist. Prof. Dr. Ilyas Yakut has received his Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics from Erciyes University, Türkiye. He is a faculty member at the Department of Translation and Interpreting, Kahramanmaras Istiklal University. His research interest areas cover Applied Linguistics, Corpus Linguistics, and Pragmatics. One of his recent articles on pronoun usage in academic writing has appeared in the Journal of English for Academic Purposes.


Adel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. John Benjamin Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.24

Anthony, L. (2022). AntConc (Version 4.0.4) [Computer Software]. Waseda University. Available from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software

Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher-level metatext in Ph.D. theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2

Cao, F., & Hu, G. (2014). Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.007

Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or academic discipline. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(10), 1807-1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004

El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2018). Why are abstracts in Ph.D. theses and research articles different? A genre-specific perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.09.005

Garcia, J. F. C., & Marco, M. J. L. (1998). A genre-based study of laboratory demonstrations. In I. Fortanet, S. Posteguillo, J. C. Palmer & J. F. Coll (Eds.), Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes (pp. 271-296). Castello de la Plana.

Harris, Z. Z. (1959). The transformational model of language structure. Anthropological Linguistics, 1(1), 27-29. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/30022172

Hempel, S., & Degand, L. (2008). Sequencers in different text genres: Academic writing, journalese, and fiction. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4), 676-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.001

Herriman, J. (2022). Metadiscourse in English instruction manuals. English for Specific Purposes, 65, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.10.003

Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5

Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341-367. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2006). Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 41-46). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0446-2

Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?. Journal of pragmatics, 113, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2020). Text-organizing metadiscourse: tracking changes in rhetorical persuasion. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 21(1), 137-164. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00039.hyl

Hyland, K., & Zou, H. J. (2020). In the frame: Signalling structure in academic articles and blogs. Journal of Pragmatics, 165, 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.002

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156

Jordan, M. D. (1985). Authority and persuasion in philosophy. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 18(2), 67-85. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40237430

Khedri, M., & Kritsis, K. (2018). Metadiscourse in applied linguistics and chemistry research article introductions. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 47-73. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2018.13793

Khedri, M., Heng, C. S., & Ebrahimi, S. F. (2013). An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines. Discourse Studies, 15(3), 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613480588

Lim, J. M. H., Loi, C. K., Hashim, A., & Liu, M. S. M. (2015). Purpose statements in experimental doctoral dissertations submitted to US universities: An inquiry into doctoral students' communicative resources in language education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.06.002

Molino, A. (2010). Personal and impersonal authorial references: A contrastive study of English and Italian Linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.007

Mu, C., Zhang, L. J., Ehrich, J., & Hong, H. (2015). The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003

Mur-Duenas, P. (2011). An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(12), 3068-3079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002

Ozdemir, N. O., & Longo, B. (2014). Metadiscourse use in thesis abstracts: A cross-cultural study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 59-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.011

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research setting. Cambridge University Press.

Tse, P., & Hyland, K. (2008). ‘Robot Kung fu’: Gender and professional identity in biology and philosophy reviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(7), 1232-1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.002

Vande K., & William, J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.2307/357609

Vázquez, I., & Giner, D. (2009). Writing with conviction: The use of boosters in modeling persuasion in academic discourses. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 22, 219-237. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2009.22.14

Yakut, I., Genc, B., & Bada, E. (2021). Epicene pronoun usage in the social sciences: The case of research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 101005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101005




How to Cite

Yuvayapan, F., & Yakut, I. (2023). Disciplinary Variations in Framing Research Articles in the Social Sciences and Humanities. English Studies at NBU, 9(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.23.1.6




Most read articles by the same author(s)