A Hauntological Reading of Daphne du Maurier's "Rebecca"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.21.1.2Keywords:
Rebecca, du Maurier, haunting, specter, phantom, hauntologyAbstract
This essay focuses on the way the main characters in Daphne du Maurier's novel Rebecca (1938) cope with the haunting influence of the past and attempts to read their struggle through the theoretical approach developed by Jacques Derrida in his Specters of Marx (1993). This approach, termed 'hauntology' by Derrida himself, revolves around the notion of the 'specter' haunting the present and emphasizes the need to find new ways of responding to it, especially because of the existing ontological failure to do so. The essay complements this reading with the earlier comparable theory of the 'phantom' and 'transgenerational haunting' developed by psychoanalysts Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok. A 'hauntological' reading of Rebecca through these tools yields results that are significantly different from traditional approaches. Suggesting that the main characters in Rebecca are complete failures in dealing with the specter in a Derridean sense, the essay argues that the novel expects from the discerning reader a more insightful approach and a better potential to understand the specter. It is suggested further that a proper acknowledgement of the specter in Rebecca reaches beyond this particular novel, having subtle but significant implications concerning not only literary analysis but also social and cultural prejudices.
References
Abraham, N. (1987). Notes on the phantom: A complement to Freud’s metapsychology (N. Rand, Trans.). Critical Inquiry, 13(2), 287-292. https://doi.org/10.1086/448390
Atkinson, M. (2013). Channeling the specter and translating phantoms: Hauntology and the spooked text. In M. Atkinson & M. Richardson (Eds.), Traumatic affect (pp. 247-270). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Beauman, S. (2007). Rebecca. In H. Taylor (Ed.), The Daphne du Maurier companion (pp. 47-60). London: Virago.
Clewell, T. (2009). Mourning, modernism, postmodernism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274259
Davis, C. (2005). État présent: Hauntology, spectres and phantoms. French Studies, 59(3), 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/kni143
Derrida, J. (2006). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning and the new international. (P. Kamuf, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge.
du Maurier, D. (2012). Rebecca. London: Virago.
Horner, A., & Zlosnik, S. (1998). Daphne du Maurier: Writing, identity and the gothic imagination. Basingstoke: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378773
Horner, A., & Zlosnik, S. (2000). Daphne du Maurier and gothic signatures: Rebecca as vamp(ire). In A. Horner & A. Keane (Eds.), Body matters: Feminism, textuality, corporeality (pp. 209-222). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Jameson, F. (2008). Marx’s purloined letter. In M. Sprinker (Ed.), Ghostly demarcations: A symposium on Jacques Derrida’s Specters of Marx. (pp. 26-67). London: Verso.
Light, A. (2001). Forever England: Femininity, literature and conservatism between the wars. Abingdon: Routledge.
Lloyd Smith, A. (1992). The phantoms of Drood and Rebecca: The uncanny reencountered through Abraham and Torok’s “cryptonymyâ€. Poetics Today, 13(2), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772534
Mitchell, M.E. (2009). ‘Beautiful creatures’: The ethics of female beauty in Daphne du Maurier’s fiction. Women: a cultural review. 20(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09574040802684798
Petersen, T. (2009). Daphne du Maurier's Rebecca: The shadow and the substance. Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association, (112), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1179/000127909804775650
Shakespeare, W. (2003). Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. In P. Edwards (Ed.), Hamlet, Prince of Denmark: Updated edition. (pp. 87-255). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, H. (2007). Rebecca’s afterlife: Sequels and other echoes. In H. Taylor (Ed.), The Daphne du Maurier companion (pp. 75-91). London: Virago.
Truffaut, F., & Scott, H. G. (1985). Hitchcock (Revised edition). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Wisker, G. (2003). Dangerous borders: Daphne du Maurier’s Rebecca: Shaking the foundations of the romance of privilege, partying and place. Journal of Gender Studies, 12(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958923032000088292
Wolfreys, J. (2002). Victorian hauntings: Spectrality, gothic, the uncanny and literature. Basingstoke: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1358-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Nil Korkut-Nayki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Access Policy and Content Licensing
All published articles on the ESNBU site are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. It allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, even for commercial purposes. The terms on which the article is published allow the posting of the published article (Version of Record) in any repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
Note that prior to, and including, Volume 10, Issue 2, 2024, articles were licensed under the Non-commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. The transition to CC BY 4.0 is effective as of Volume 11, Issue 1, 2025.
In other words, under the CC BY 4.0 license users are free to
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution (by) - You must give appropriate credit (Title, Author, Source, License), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notice: No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
If the law requires that the article be published in the public domain, authors will notify ESNBU at the time of submission, and in such cases the article shall be released under the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver CC0 1.0 Universal.
Copyright
Copyright for articles published in ESNBU are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. Authors retain full publishing rights and are encouraged to upload their work to institutional repositories, social academic networking sites, etc. ESNBU is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Exceptions to copyright policy
Occasionally ESNBU may co-publish articles jointly with other publishers, and different licensing conditions may then apply.
