The Portraiture of Stockholm Syndrome: Cultural Dislocation in Phillis Wheatley's Poetry Collection and Selected African American Texts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.18.1.4Keywords:
Stockholm Syndrome, African American literature, Phillis Wheatley, Transatlantic slavery, Ego-Defence MechanismAbstract
One of the tropes that have often been glossed over in African American literature is the concept of Stockholm Syndrome. The syndrome emphasises irrationality and abnormal psychological or mental disposition of Stockholm Syndrome sufferers towards individuals responsible for their pitiable conditions. This article examines the conception and its nexus with slavery and the use of religion (Christianity) as an ideological tool for the indoctrination or brainwashing of African slaves and their descendants in the United States of America. I argue that the syndrome, though conceived as a correlate of Freudian ego-defence mechanism, operates like a psychedelic or hallucinogenic drug which, according to Karl Marx, dulls the reasoning capacity and cerebration of the sufferers and prevents them from thinking rationally. Besides, it alters their perception of reality forcing them to accept abnormality as normality in a bid to create an escapist route for their fears, hurt feelings and pent-up wounds.
References
Adeniyi, E. I. (2017). Bourgeois Tensions, Marxist Economics and Aphaeresis of Communal Spirit in Sembene Ousmane's God's Bits of Wood and Ngugi wa Thiong'o's Devil on the Cross. ELOPE, 14(2), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.14.2.55-68
Appiah, A. (1991). Is the Post- in Postmodernism the Post- in Postcolonial? Critical Inquiry, 17(2), 336-357. https://doi.org/10.1086/448586
Barker-Benfield, G. J. & Clinton, C. (1988). (Eds.), Portraits of African Women: From Settlement to the Present. Oxford University Press.
Barry, P. (1995). Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Manchester University Press.
Césaire, A. (1972). Discourse on Colonialism (Joan Pinkham, Trans.). Monthly Review Press.
Christopher, L. (2009). Stolen: Letter to My Captor. Chicken House.
Collins, T. (1975). Phillis Wheatley: The Dark Side of the Poetry. Phylon, 36, 78-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/274847
Davenport, F. G. & Paullin, C. O. (2004). European Treaties bearing on the History of the United States and its Dependencies to 1648. The Lawbook Exchange.
Ewen, R. B. (2003). An Introduction to Theories of Personality. 6th Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607287
Freud, A. (1966). The Ego and Mechanisms of Defence. Karnac Books.
Ganzevoort, R. R. (2011). Narrative Approaches. In B. Miller-McLemore (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Practical Theology ,(pp. 214-223). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444345742.ch20
Gates, H. L. (2003). The Trials of Phillis Wheatley: America's First Black Poet and Her Encounter with the Founding Fathers. Basic Civitas Books.
Hicks, S. R. C. (2004). Explaining Postmodernism: Scepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. Scholargy Publishing.
Hughes, L. (2008). Not Without Laughter. Dover Publications.
Hurmence B. (1984). My Folks Don't Want me to Talk about Slavery. John F. Blair.
Igboin, B. O. (2014). Karl Marx on Religion: The Perspective of Boko Haram in Nigeria. Journal of Religious Culture, 183, 1-17. https://d-nb.info/1079418288/34
Laplanche, J. & Pontalis, J. (1973). The Language of Psychoanalysis (D. Nicholson-Smith. Trans.). The Hogarth Press & the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
Mani, M. (2015). Racial Awareness in Phillis Wheatley's Selected Poems. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 56, 74-79. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.56.74
Methuselah, J. S. (2014). Applying the Stockholm Syndrome Phenomenon in Osofisan's Morountodun to Leadership in Africa. IORS Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(5), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-19565359
Nair, M. S. (2015). Stockholm Syndrome – A Self Delusive Survival Strategy. International Journal of Advanced Research 3(11), 385-388. http://www.journalijar.com/uploads/309_IJAR-7677.pdf
Ogunyemi, C. O. (1976). Phillis Wheatley: The Modest Beginning. Studies in Black Literature, 73, 16-19.
Truth, S. (2005). The Narrative of Sojourner Truth. Paperview Ltd and the Boston Globe.
Tyson, L. (2016). Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide. Routledge.
Uroh, C. O. 2008. Looking through a broken mirror: Blackness, Shared Memory, Shared Identity and Shared Destiny. In B. Barry, E. Soumonni & L. Sansone (Eds.), Africa, Brazil and the Construction of Trans-Atlantic Black Identities, (pp.127-144). Africa World Press Inc.
Wade, A. (2015). The Myth of 'Stockholm Syndrome' and other Concepts invented to Discredit Women Victims of Violence. http://www.relatehb.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Stockholm-Syn-Hawkes-Bay-Abridged.pdf
Walvin, J. (2007). A Short History of Slavery. Penguin Books.
Wertheimer, E. (2006). Underwriting: The Poetics of Insurance in America, 1722-1872. Stanford University Press.
Whitley, P. (1793). Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral. Barber & Southwick.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Emmanuel Adeniyi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Access Policy and Content Licensing
All published articles on the ESNBU site are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. It allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, even for commercial purposes. The terms on which the article is published allow the posting of the published article (Version of Record) in any repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
Note that prior to, and including, Volume 10, Issue 2, 2024, articles were licensed under the Non-commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. The transition to CC BY 4.0 is effective as of Volume 11, Issue 1, 2025.
In other words, under the CC BY 4.0 license users are free to
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution (by) - You must give appropriate credit (Title, Author, Source, License), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notice: No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
If the law requires that the article be published in the public domain, authors will notify ESNBU at the time of submission, and in such cases the article shall be released under the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver CC0 1.0 Universal.
Copyright
Copyright for articles published in ESNBU are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. Authors retain full publishing rights and are encouraged to upload their work to institutional repositories, social academic networking sites, etc. ESNBU is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Exceptions to copyright policy
Occasionally ESNBU may co-publish articles jointly with other publishers, and different licensing conditions may then apply.
