Object insertion in Old English verbs of throwing: A corpus-based study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.25.2.5Keywords:
Old English ditransitives, throw verbs, Dictionary of Old English Corpus, object insertion, Diachronic Construction Grammar, (non-)compositionalityAbstract
This study demonstrates for the first time that ballistic motion is part of Old English ditransitives, functioning in the Nominative-Accusative-Dative construction. A search for throw terms in A Thesaurus of Old English generates a pilot list of candidates, whose participation in ditransitives is verified through queries performed on the Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. The findings reveal a relatively diverse group of 14 verb types and 51 tokens expressing deictically directed transfer (i.e., throwing to and from), with some units emphasizing force or manner of motion. In line with Diachronic Construction Grammar, the new verb class is incorporated into a lexicality-schematicity hierarchy, a semantic map proposal for the group is discussed in detail, and the argument structure of Old English throw verbs is formalized into boxes and described. This study pays particular attention to the typological distinction between basic and derived coding frames, and, more specifically, to object insertion as a mechanism for generating ditransitives from primary caused-motion constructions. A comparison of the argument structures found in the Old English corpus with those of their modern English counterparts suggests a lower degree of constructionalization in the Old English throw group, based on the frequent presence of a fourth argument, a directional.
References
Barðdal, J. (2007). The semantic and lexical range of the ditransitive construction in the history of (North) Germanic. Functions of Language, 14(1), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.14.1.03bar
Barðdal, J. (2008). Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.8
Barðdal, J. (2011). The rise of dative substitution in the history of Icelandic: A diachronic construction grammar account. Lingua, 121(1), 60-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.007
Barðdal, J., & Gildea, S (2015). Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer & S. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 1-50). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.01bar
Barðdal, J., Kristoffersen, J. K. E., & Sveen, A. (2011). West Scandinavian ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian V-REFL-NP construction. Linguistics, 49(1), 53-104. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.002
Bosworth, J. & Toller, T. N. (1921). An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Oxford University Press.
Burchfield, R. W (Ed.). (1987). The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Davies, M. (2004). British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc
Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). https://www.english-corpora.org/coca
De Cuypere, L. (2015a). A multivariate analysis of the old English ACC + DAT double object alternation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(2), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0011
De Cuypere, L. (2015b). The Old English to-dative construction. English Language and Linguistics, 19(1). 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674314000276
Díaz-Vera, J. E. (2011). Reconstructing the Old English Cultural Model for Fear. 2011. Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos, 33(1). 285-103. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41472336
Giarda, M. (2021). Valency Patterns in Old English. Tesi di Laurea Magistrale. Università degli Studi di Pavia.
Giarda, M. (2024). Old English. In S. Luraghi, M. Cennamo, & A. P. Aprosio (Eds.), PaVeDa - Pavia Verbs Database. Università di Pavia. https://paveda.unipv.it/contributions/olde1238
Gildea, S., & de Castro Alves F. (2020). Reconstructing the Source of Nominative-Absolutive Alignment in Two Amazonian Language Families. In J. Barðdal, S. Gildea, & E. Luján (Eds.), Reconstructing Syntax (pp. 47-107). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392007_003
Gildea, S., & J. Barðdal. (2023). From grammaticalization to Diachronic Construction Grammar: A natural evolution of the paradigm. Studies in Language, 47(4), 743-88. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20079.gil
Goddard, C. (2013). English. In I. Hartmann, M. Haspelmath, & B. Taylor (Eds.), Valency Patterns Leipzig. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://valpal.info/contributions/icel1247
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2019). Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc772nn
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R., & Wilson, R. (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language, 65(2), 203-257. https://doi.org/10.2307/415332
Hartmann, I., Haspelmath, M., & Taylor, B. (Eds.) (2013). Valency Patterns Leipzig. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://valpal.info
Haspelmath, M. & Hartmann, I. (2015). 3. Comparing verbal valency across languages. In A. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Eds.), Volume 1 Introducing the Framework, and Case Studies from Africa and Eurasia (pp. 21-72). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-006
Haspelmath, M. (2015). Ditransitive constructions. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1(1), 19-41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125204
Healey, A. diP., Wilkin, J. P., & Xiang, X. (2015). The Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. University of Toronto.
Kytö, M., & Rissanen, M. (1992). A Language in transition: The Helsinki Corpus of English texts. ICAME Journal 16, 7-27. https://varieng.helsinki.fi/CoRD/corpora/HelsinkiCorpus/genres.html
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. University of Chicago Press.
Lewis, C. T, and Short, C. (1945). A Latin Dictionary. Clarendon Press.
Luján, E., & Ruiz Abad. C. (2014). Semantic roles and word formation. Instrument and location in Ancient Greek. In S. Luraghi, & H. Narrog (Eds.), Perspectives on semantic roles (pp. 241-270). John Benjamins. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027269850-tsl.106.08luj
Luraghi, S., Aprosio, A. P., Zanchi, C & Giulani, M. (2024). Introducing PaVeDa - Pavia verbs Database: Valency Patterns and Pattern Comparison in Ancient Indo-European Languages. In R. Sprugnoli & M. Passarotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Language Technologies for Historical and Ancient Languages (LT4HALA) @ LREC-COLING-2024 (pp. 79-88). ELRA and ICCL. https://aclanthology.org/2024.lt4hala-1.10.pdf
Malchukov, A., Haspelmath, M., & Comrie, B. (2010). Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. In A. Malchukov, M. Haspelmath, & B. Comrie (Eds.), Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook (pp. 1-64). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220377.1
Michaelis, L. A. (2010). Sign-based construction grammar. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 155-176). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0007
Michaelis, L. A. (2012). Making the case for construction grammar. In H. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp. 31-68). CSLI Publications. https://spot.colorado.edu/~michaeli/Making_the_case.pdf
Möhlig-Falke, R. (2015). Using the Dictionary of Old English Corpus for linguistic analyses: A basic classification of the textual sources. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 116, 395-420.
Oxford University Press. (2025). Throw, v.¹. Oxford English dictionary. https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/8579167991
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4158.001.0001
Roberts, J, Kay, C., & Grundy, L. (1995). A Thesaurus of Old English. King's College London. Centre for Late Antique and Medieval Studies. https://oldenglishthesaurus.arts.gla.ac.uk
Sag, I. (2012). Sign-based construction grammar: An informal synopsis. In H. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp. 69-202). CSLI Publications. https://spot.colorado.edu/~michaeli/Making_the_case.pdf
Tarsi, M., & Zanchi, C. (2024). Gothic. In by S. Luraghi, M. Cennamo, & A. P. Aprosio (Eds.), PaVeDa - Pavia Verbs Database. Università di Pavia. https://paveda.unipv.it/contributions/goth1244
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
Vázquez-González, J. G. (2024). Updating Old English Dative-Genitives: A Diachronic Construction Grammar Account. Languages, 9(6), 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9060213
Vázquez-González, J. G., & Barðdal, J. (2019). Reconstructing the ditransitive construction for Proto-Germanic: Gothic, Old English and Old Norse-Icelandic. Folia Linguistica, 53(40-s2), 555-620. https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2019-0021
Visser, F. T. (1963). An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Volume 1. Syntactical Units with One Verb. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004531369
Zanchi, C., Luraghi, S., & C. R. Combei. (2022). PaVeDa - Pavia Verbs Database: Challenges and Perspectives, in E. Vylomova, E. Ponti, & R. Cotterell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP (pp. 99-102). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.sigtyp-1.14
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Juan Gabriel Vázquez-González
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Access Policy and Content Licensing
All published articles on the ESNBU site are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. It allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, even for commercial purposes. The terms on which the article is published allow the posting of the published article (Version of Record) in any repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
Note that prior to, and including, Volume 10, Issue 2, 2024, articles were licensed under the Non-commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. The transition to CC BY 4.0 is effective as of Volume 11, Issue 1, 2025.
In other words, under the CC BY 4.0 license users are free to
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution (by) - You must give appropriate credit (Title, Author, Source, License), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notice: No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
If the law requires that the article be published in the public domain, authors will notify ESNBU at the time of submission, and in such cases the article shall be released under the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver CC0 1.0 Universal.
Copyright
Copyright for articles published in ESNBU are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. Authors retain full publishing rights and are encouraged to upload their work to institutional repositories, social academic networking sites, etc. ESNBU is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Exceptions to copyright policy
Occasionally ESNBU may co-publish articles jointly with other publishers, and different licensing conditions may then apply.
