Henry James and The Aspern papers: Archive, memory, and the failure of biography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.25.1.6Keywords:
Henry James, The Aspern Papers, biography, archive, archaeology, Gothic SpaceAbstract
This paper examines The Aspern Papers by Henry James through the lens of archive theory, biographical ethics, and the complexities of memory preservation. It explores how the protagonist’s obsessive pursuit of Aspern’s documents represents the human desire to reconstruct the Romantic past in Gothic atmosphere of Venice, often at the expense of ethical considerations and lived experience. The analysis highlights the symbolic significance of Juliana Bordereau, not merely as a guardian of Aspern’s legacy but as a living archive whose testimony remains undervalued. The paper connects James’s themes to his personal decision to destroy his own letters, reflecting his scepticism toward biographical intrusions. Comparisons with The Sense of the Past and other Jamesian works illustrate recurring motifs of archival failure and the tension between material and immaterial memory, as well as the role of destruction – both literal, through the burning of documents, and metaphorical, through the erasure of identities – in shaping historical narrative. Finally, the discussion extends to the ethical responsibilities of archivists and biographers, questioning whether written records alone can ever truly encapsulate the essence of a life.
References
Bauer, G. (2016). Houses, Secrets, and the Closet – Locating Masculinities from the Gothic Novel to Henry James. Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839434680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839434680
Bell, M. (1989). “The Aspern Papers”: The Unvisitable Past. The Henry James Review, 10(2), 120-127. https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2010.0382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2010.0382
Brown, E. (1991). Revising Henry James: Reading the Space of The Aspern Papers. American Literature, 63(2), 263-278. https://doi.org/10.2307/2927165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2927165
Brylowski, A. S. (1969). In Defense of the First Person Narrator in “The Aspern Papers”. The Centennial Review, 13(2), 215-240.
Bysshe Stein, W. (1959). The Aspern Papers: A Comedy of Masks. Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 14(2), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/3044168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ncl.1959.14.2.99p0432c
Cassirer, E. (2021). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Volume 2: Mythical Thinking. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429282478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429282478
Church, J. (1990). Writing and the Dispossession of Woman in “The Aspern Papers”. American Imago, 47(1), 23-42.
Currier Bell, B. (1981). Beyond Irony in Henry James: “The Aspern Papers”. Studies in the Novel, 13(3), 282-293.
Davidson, A. E. (1988). Transformations of Text in Henry James’s The Aspern Papers. English Studies in Canada, 14(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1353/esc.1988.0019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/esc.1988.0019
Derrida, J. (1998). Archive Fever – A Freudian Impression. The University of Chicago Press.
Forde, V. M. (1970). “The Aspern Papers”: What Price, Defeat. Notre Dame English Journal, 6(1-2), 17-24.
González, S. P. (2008). The Lure of the Object in Henry James’s Fictions of Thwarted Desire: Reflections on the Libidinal and Social Poetics of Literary Forms. Atlantis, 30(2), 27-41.
Hadley, T. (1997). “The Aspern Papers”: Henry James’s ‘Editorial Heart’. The Cambridge Quarterly, 26(4), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/26.4.314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/26.4.314
Hewish, A. (2016). Cryptic Relations in Henry James’s “The Aspern Papers”. The Henry James Review, 37(3), 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2016.0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2016.0021
Hoeveler, D. L. (2008). The Literal and Literary Circulation of Amelia Curran’s Portrait of Percy Shelley. The Wordsworth Circle, 39(1), 27-30. https://doi.org/10.1086/TWC24045182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/TWC24045182
James, H. (1922). The Aspern Papers – The Turn of the Screw – The Liar – The Two Faces. Macmillan and co.
Korg, J. (1962). What Aspern Papers? A Hypothesis. College English, 23(5), 378-381. https://doi.org/10.2307/373811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ce196228023
Mamoli Zorzi, R. (2011). The Aspern Papers: From Florence to an Intertextual City, Venice. In D. Tredy, A. Duperray & A. Harding (Eds.), Henry James’s Europe: Heritage and Transfer (pp. 103-111). Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0013.09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0013.09
Meyers, J. (2021). “The Aspern Papers” and Modern Biography. The Henry James Review, 42(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2021.0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2021.0008
Norris Scales, J. (1991). The Ironic Smile: Pushkin’s “The Queen of Spades” and James’ “The Aspern Papers”. CLA Journal, 34(4), 486-490.
Rosenberg, J. E. (2006). Tangible Objects: Grasping “The Aspern Papers”. The Henry James Review, 27(3), 256-263. https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2006.0022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2006.0022
Savoy, E. (2010). Aspern’s Archive. The Henry James Review, 31(1), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.0.0074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.0.0074
Scharnhorst, G. (1990). James, “The Aspern Papers,” and the Ethics of Literary Biography. Modern Fiction Studies, 36(2), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.0.0370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.0.0370
Scholl, D. G. (2013). Secret Paternity in James’s The Aspern Papers: Whose Letters?. Modern Philology, 111(1), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1086/671810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/671810
Stoppani, T. (2009). Venetian Dusts. Log, (17), 109-118.
Tsimpouki, T. (2018). Henry James’s “The Aspern Papers”: Between the Narrative of an Archive and the Archive of Narrative. The Henry James Review, 39(2), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2018.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2018.0012
Waldmeir, J. J. (1982). Miss Tina Did It: A Fresh Look at “The Aspern Papers”. The Centennial Review, 26(3), 256-267.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Domeniko Kvartuč

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Access Policy and Content Licensing
All published articles on the ESNBU site are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. It allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, even for commercial purposes. The terms on which the article is published allow the posting of the published article (Version of Record) in any repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
Note that prior to, and including, Volume 10, Issue 2, 2024, articles were licensed under the Non-commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. The transition to CC BY 4.0 is effective as of Volume 11, Issue 1, 2025.
In other words, under the CC BY 4.0 license users are free to
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution (by) - You must give appropriate credit (Title, Author, Source, License), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notice: No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
If the law requires that the article be published in the public domain, authors will notify ESNBU at the time of submission, and in such cases the article shall be released under the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver CC0 1.0 Universal.
Copyright
Copyright for articles published in ESNBU are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. Authors retain full publishing rights and are encouraged to upload their work to institutional repositories, social academic networking sites, etc. ESNBU is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Exceptions to copyright policy
Occasionally ESNBU may co-publish articles jointly with other publishers, and different licensing conditions may then apply.