Four Innovative Teaching Methods. Is There a Place for Post-Pedagogy?


  • Hristo Chukurliev New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria



post-pedagogy, innovative teaching approaches, learning styles


The article examines the need for a new pedagogical framework in the context of contemporary higher education, influenced by digital innovations and generational change. It introduces four innovative pedagogical approaches – Description of an Object, Humanities Laboratory, Venus of Slatina, and Time Machine – which serve as a basis for discussing 'post-pedagogy'. The approaches are united by the goal of achieving priorities such as interdisciplinary training, critical thinking, and the encouragement of curiosity. By proposing the integration of these methods, the article aims to draw attention to the changed landscape of the educational field.

Author Biography

Hristo Chukurliev, New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hristo Chukurliev holds a Master's degree in Bulgarian Philology from Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" and a Doctorate in Administration and Management from New Bulgarian University. He is a member of the Pedagogy Section in the Department of Foreign Languages and Cultures at New Bulgarian University. His research interests include management models, digital technologies, transformation processes, and the history of civilizations and religions. He focuses on transforming teaching methods in higher education and their link to future professions.


Bruner, J., (2004). A Short History of Psychological Theories of Learning. Daedalus, 133(1), 13-20. DOI:

Feldt, E. J. & Petersen, E. B., (2021). Studying as Experimentation: Habits and Obstacles in the Ecology of the University. Philosophy and Theory in Higher Education, 3(3), 55-67. DOI:

Gardner, H., (1983). Frames of Mind. The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.

Georgiev, L., (2011). Teaching Through Cases [Prepodavane chrez kazusi]. NBU Publishing House.

Ivanov, I., (2005). Interactive Methods of Teaching [Interaktivni Metodi na Obuchenie] (pp. 1-17). Jubilee scientific conference with international participation 50 years DIPKU - Varna "Education and qualification of pedagogical personnel - development and projections in the 21st century" [Yubileina nauchna konferentsiya s mezhdunarodno uchastie 50 godini DIPKU – Varna "Obrazovanie i kvalifikatsiya na pedagogicheskite kadri – razvitie i proektsii prez KHKHI vek"].

Kamenov, H., (2022). Theories of Learning.

OECD (2023), PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education, PISA. OECD Publishing. DOI:

Paul, A. M., (2021). The Extended Mind: The Power of Thinking Outside the Brain. Mariner Books.

Peycheva-Forsyth, R., (2022). Paradigms of Learning as a Theoretical Foundation for Implementing Various Models of E-learning. [Paradigmi na ucheneto kato osnova za realizirane na raznoobrazni modeli na elektronno obuchenie]

Shulman, L. S., (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-21. DOI:

Stoyanova, M., Tuparova, D. & Samardzhiev, K., (2018). Theories of Learning and Gamification in Education [Teoriite za uchene i igrovizatsiyata v obuchenieto]. XI National Conference “Education and Research in the Information Society” [XI Natsionalna konferentsia “Obrazovanieto i izsledvaniyata v informatsionnoto obshtestvo"]. Plovdiv, Institute of Mathematics and Informatics at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Association for Information Society Development, pp. 31-40.

Willingham, D. & Riener, C., (2010). The Myth of Learning Styles. Change, 42(5), 32-35. DOI:




How to Cite

Chukurliev, H. (2024). Four Innovative Teaching Methods. Is There a Place for Post-Pedagogy?. English Studies at NBU, 10(1), 43–58.