Semiotic mediation for the sustainable digital empowerment of older adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33919/dasc.24.7.5Keywords:
digital empowerment, older adults, metaphorical registers, semiotic mediation, digital acculturationAbstract
As digital technologies proliferate, older adults are still facing significant challenges in achieving sustainable digital empowerment. This qualitative study examines the metaphorical registers spontaneously mobilized by seniors when discussing digital tools. It also highlights subjective semiotic framings which hinder their digital acculturation. Through ethnographic observations of digital literacy training, we identify diverse metaphorical projections conveying apprehensions (technologies as “nests of problems”, “magical” realms) but also motivating drivers towards meaningful digital appropriation. The findings underscore the importance of symbolic mediation strategies, in order to deconstruct inhibiting traditional theories and foster technology uses rooted in the life contexts of seniors. By elucidating the complex interplay of cognitive, emotional and cultural tensions shaping digital relationships, our research project argues for designing digital training less as technical instruction than as holistic empowerment journeys integrating identity-related dimensions. Ultimately, research on these semiotic foundations contributes to broader societal efforts that ensure equal voices for diverse knowledge approaches in an increasingly AI-dominated world. Only through such inclusive mediation efforts can we truly accompany digital “immigrants” toward affirmative technological citizenship.
References
Blavin, J. H., I. G. Cohen. 2002. “Gore, Gibson, and Goldsmith: The Evolution of Internet Metaphors in Law and Commentary”. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 25, 531–574.
Braun, V., V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology”. Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 77–101.
Burgers, C. 2016. “Conceptualizing Change in Communication Through Metaphor”. Journal of Communication, Vol. 66, No. 1, 250–265.
Deci, E. L., R. M. Ryan. 2000. “The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-determination of Behavior”. Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 11, No. 4, 227–268.
Deuze, M. 2012. Media Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm”. Journal of Communication, Vol. 43, No. 4, 51–58.
Jensen, K. 2015. Digital Мetaphors – Metaphors as a Phenomenon in the Digital Age. Metaphor in Communication, Science and Education, 85–89.
Khosravi, P., A. H. Ghapanchi. 2016. “Investigating the Effectiveness of Technologies Applied to Assist Seniors: A Systematic Literature Review”. International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 85, No. 1, 17–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.014.
Lakoff, G., M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nascimento, F., E. Chown. 2023. Meaningful Technologies How Digital Metaphors Change the Way We Think and Live. Lever Press.
Nunes, M. 1995. “Jean Baudrillard in Cyberspace: Internet, Virtuality, and Postmodernity”. Style, Vol. 29, No. 2, 314–327.
Perret-Clermont, A. N., F. Carugati and J. Oates. 2004. A Socio-cognitive Perspective on Learning and Cognitive Development. In Oates, J., A. Grayson (eds. ). Cognitive and Language Development in Children. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 303–332.
Ueno, A., C. Dennis, and G. A. Dafoulas. 2023. “Digital Exclusion and Relative Digital Deprivation: Exploring Factors and Moderators of Internet Non-use in the UK”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 197, 122935. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122935.
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. 1991. Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Harvard University Press.
