The Four Philosophical Families of Tzvetan Todorov and Universities. On the Degrees of Love and Language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33919/ANHNBU.25.2.1.7Keywords:
Tzvetan Todorov, philosophical families, reformist universities, critical humanism, higher education, digital transformationAbstract
Tzvetan Todorov classifies philosophers into four families: Conservatives, scientists, individualists, and humanists, each with a unique approach to freedom and knowledge. He does not discuss categories of universities. This paper applies his framework of the four philosophical families to the academic landscape. Conservative universities emphasize tradition and stability, often resisting change. Scientistic universities focus on empirical evidence and innovation, aligning with technical fields. Individualist universities prioritize creativity, autonomy, and personal expression, seen in liberal arts and entrepreneurial schools. Humanist universities, or reformist institutions, center on ethics and community, adapting to societal changes. Todorov’s framework explores how these institutions evolve in response to digital and technological shifts.
References
Binet, Laurent. 2022. Sedmata funktsiya na ezika [The Seventh Function of Language]. Paradox.
Bogdanov, Bogdan. 2001. Realniyat i potentsialniyat chuzhdenets [The Real and Potential Foreigner]. In Tzvetan Todorov: The Mobile Thought. Edited by Stoyan Atanassov, 241–250. LIK.
Boyadzhieva, Pepka. 2010. Sotsialnoto inzhenerstvo [Social Engineering]. Institute for the Study of Recent Past.
Chukurliev, Hristo. 2024. Evolyutsiya na universitetskoto obrazovanie [Evolution of University Education]. New Bulgarian University.
Georgiev, Lyudmil. 2023. “Obrazovanie, znanie i mŭdrost za dobroto na obshtestvoto: Strategicheski plan na NBU 2023–2028” [Education, Knowledge, and Wisdom for the Good of Society: Strategic Plan of NBU 2023-2028]. New Bulgarian University. file:///Users/hchukurliev/Downloads/sp2023-2028.pdf.
Golsan, Richard J. 1988. “Todorov’s ‘New’ Humanism: France’s ‘Imperfect Garden’.” South Central Review 47–53. doi:10.2307/3189833.
Marchitello, Howard. 1988. “Guest Editor’s Introduction: Todorov’s ‘Moral Science’.” South Central Review 3/4: 1–5.
Todorov, Tzvetan. 2016. Nedovŭrshenata gradina [The Unfinished Garden]. Sofia: New Bulgarian University.
Todorov, Tzvetan, Richard J. Golsan, and Nathan Bracher. 2018. “Tzvetan Todorov, A Final Interview.” South Central Review (2): 4–37.
Vallejo, Irene. 2023. Bezkraiat v strŭk trŭstika [Infinity in a Reed]. Colibri.
Vaughan, William. 2018. “Todorov’s Critical Humanism and Its Relevance to Philosophy.” South Central Review, 68–79.
Waugh, Linda R. 1980. “The Poetic Function in the Theory of Roman Jakobson.” Poetics Today 2 (1a): 57–82.
Zbinden, Karine and Tzvetan Todorov. 2004. “In Praise of Nuance: An Interview with Tzvetan Todorov.” Salmagundi 141/142: 3–26.
