The cinefication of museums: from exhibitions to films. The case of Tate Modern

Authors

  • Aluminé Rosso

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33919/dasc.22.5.3

Keywords:

modern art museums, museums communication, semiotics of space, contemporary art exhibitions, cinema, cultural industries, exhibitions trailers

Abstract

Since the end of the 20th century, museum institutions have been adopting the logic of communication, promotion, and administration typical of cultural industries, mainly Cinema. In 1994, Andreas Huyssen argued that the museum, as an elitist place of preservation of canon and high culture, gave way to the museum as a mass medium. Cinema became the paradigm of contemporary cultural activities whose new exhibition practices respond to the changing expectations of the public and their constant search for stellar events.Since the end of the 20th century, museum institutions have been adopting the logic of communication, promotion, and administration typical of cultural industries, mainly Cinema. In 1994, Andreas Huyssen argued that the museum, as an elitist place of preservation of canon and high culture, gave way to the museum as a mass medium. Cinema became the paradigm of contemporary cultural activities whose new exhibition practices respond to the changing expectations of the public and their constant search for stellar events. This process is evident in the increasing use of banners, marquees, and all manner of resources aimed at promoting the temporary exhibitions gaining their place as the main attractions of art museums. Moreover, with the advent of social media, the phenomenon of cinefication of the museum has accelerated. Exhibitions are now titled, conceived, promoted, and distributed as films, while artists, adorned by the figure of the genius, are presented as parts of the art history star system. In order to highlight this phenomenon, we present an analysis of the programming and promotion of temporary exhibitions at Tate Modern, the paradigm of 21st-century museums. This institution not only titles its exhibitions in a cinematographic manner but also produces trailers and posts them on its website and social media. Our work focuses on one exhibition in particular: Picasso 1932, Love, Fame, Tragedy. To this end we observed both the curatorial discourse and the communication strategies applied by Tate. This paper is part of a research project that includes MoMA, Malba, Centre Pompidou, and Reina Sofia. The study of this phenomenon will provide an overview of the epochal style of modern art museums in the conception and communication of modern and contemporary art exhibitions.

This process is evident in the increasing use of banners, marquees, and all manner of resources aimed at promoting the temporary exhibitions gaining their place as the main attractions of art museums. Moreover, with the advent of social media, the phenomenon of cinefication of the museum has accelerated. Exhibitions are now titled, conceived, promoted, and distributed as films, while artists, adorned by the figure of the genius, are presented as parts of the art history star system.

In order to highlight this phenomenon, we present an analysis of the programming and promotion of temporary exhibitions at Tate Modern, the paradigm of 21st-century museums. This institution not only titles its exhibitions in a cinematographic manner but also produces trailers and posts them on its website and social media. Our work focuses on one exhibition in particular: Picasso 1932, Love, Fame, Tragedy. To this end we observed both the curatorial discourse and the communication strategies applied by Tate.

This paper is part of a research project that includes MoMA, Malba, Centre Pompidou, and Reina Sofia. The study of this phenomenon will provide an overview of the epochal style of modern art museums in the conception and communication of modern and contemporary art exhibitions.

References

Alzamora, G. C., R. R. Gambarato. 2014. “Peircean Semiotics and Trans-media Dynamics”. Communicational Potentiality of the Model of Semiosis. Oc-ula-Occhio semiotico sui medi, Vol. 15, Issue 1, 1–13.

Barker, E. (ed.). 1999. Contemporary Cultures of Display. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Biskind, P. 2002. Le nouvel Hollywood. Paris: Ed. Le Cherche Midi

Bishop, C. 2018. Radical Museology. Or What is “Contemporary” in Con-temporary Art Museums? Buenos Aires: Libretto

Fleck, R. 2014. The Art System in the 21st Century. Museums, artists, collec-tors, galleries. Buenos Aires: Mardulce.

Freeman, M. 2017. From Sequel to Quasi-Novelization: ‘Splinter of the mind’s Eye and the 1970,s Culture of Transmedia Contingency. In STAR WARS and the History of Transmedia Storytelling. Amsterdam University Press.

Friedenthal, A. J. 2017. Retcon Game: Retroactive Continuity and the Hyper-linking of America. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi.

García Canclini, N. 2010. Are Architects and Spectacle Negative for Muse-ums? The Museum is on Stage. Politics and Culture in Latin America. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Genette, G. 1982. Palimpsestes. La littérature au second degré. Paris, Seuil

Groys, B. 2008. The Topology of Contemporary Art. In Antinomies of Art and Culture: Modernity, Postmodernity, Contemporaneity, 71–80.

Guynes, S. A., D. Hassler-Forest. 2017. Star Wars and the History of Trans-media Storytelling. Amsterdam: University Press.

Hutcheon, L. 2006. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge.

Huyssen, A. 1994. Twilight Memories: Marking Time in a Culture of Amnesia. New York: Routledge, 13–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203610213.

King, G. 2002. New Hollywood Cinema: An Introduction. London: Rout-ledge.

Knol, M. 2020. Blockbuster Addiction. MuseumNext. Available at: http://www.museumnext.com/article/blockbuster-addiction/ (accessed 8 August 2021).

Lavik, E. 2009. “New Narrative Depths? Spectacle and Narrative in Block-buster Cinema Revisited”. Nordicom Review 30, 2 Available at: http://hdl.han-dle.net/2077/37496.

McIntyre, D. 2012. “Prototypical Characteristics of Blockbuster Movie Di-alogue: A Corpus Stylistic Analysis”. Texas Studies in Literature and Language, Vol. 54, Issue 3, 402–425.

Preciado, P. 2017. The Museum off: Pornography, Architecture, Neoliberal-ism, and Museums. Buenos Aires: MALBA.

Smith, T. 2012. What is Contemporary Art? Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno.

Steimberg, O. 2013. Semiotics. The Semiotics of Genres, of Styles, of Transpo-sition. Buenos Aires: Eterna Cadencia.

Stringer, J. 2003. Movie Blockbusters. 1st ed. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.

org/10.4324/9781315012919.

Verón, E. 1998. La semiosis social: fragmentos de una teoría de la discursiv-idad. Editorial Gedisa.

Vincenot, E. 2014. “L’attaque des clowns: emprunts parodiques du ciné-ma latino-américain aux blockbusters hollywoodiens”. reCHERches. Culture et histoire dans l’espace roman, Vol. 12, 265–279.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Rosso, A. (2022). The cinefication of museums: from exhibitions to films. The case of Tate Modern. Digital Age in Semiotics & Communication, 5, 35–61. https://doi.org/10.33919/dasc.22.5.3