I kissed an NPC, and I liked it: Love and sexuality in digital games
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33919/dasc.19.2.3Keywords:
Digital games, Love, Meaning-making, Semiotics, SexualityAbstract
IIn this paper we will discuss the presence of love and sexuality in digital games (from ‘80s amateur porn games to the newest released VR ludo-erotic entertainment), both as representation and as experienced simulation. By way of a semiotic framework, we will analyze the following key features that produce the meaning of love and sexuality (L&S from now on) in these texts: the possibility of semantic manipulation, intersubjective enunciation, a cognitive sensibility created through a ratio, and the presence of an economy of meaning. Furthermore, we will look not only at what these games represent and allow players to do, but also at players’ strategies and actions that give love and sex meaning in these games. Finally, this work will allow us to highlight not only the ideological and socio-cultural relevance of love and sex in digital games, but also the limits of a classical semiotic approach to this kind of problem, and consequently to make a general theoretical reflection in the conclusion.
References
Bankov, K. 2018. Scarcity and Meaning: towards a Semiotics of Eco-nomic Transaction. In Cobley, Paul and Alteanu, Alin (eds). Semiotics and its Masters. Vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2018.
Barthes, R. 1977. Fragments d’un discours amoureux. Paris: Seuil.
Bogost, I. 2007. Persuasive Game. Massachusetts: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5334.001.0001
Bondì, A. 2010. Il linguaggio come “fenomenoâ€. L’esperienza linguistica fra Saussure e la fenomenologia. RIFL, 3, pp. 39-51.
Bondì, A. 2008.Regimi del senso. La teoria delle ‘forme semantiche’ tra diversità linguistica e stabilizzazione semiotica. XIV Colloque de la Société Italienne de Philosophie du langage, Siena.
Danaher, J & McArthur, M. 2017. Robot Sex. Social and ethical impli-cations. MIT, USA. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262036689.001.0001
Degenaar, J. & O’Regan, K. 2015. Sensorimotor theory and Enactivism. In Topoi (2017) 36: 393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9338-z
Eco, U. 2004. Storia della bellezza. Milano: Bompiani
Eco, U. 1979. Lector in Fabula. Milano: Bompiani.
Ferri, G. 2007. Narrating machines and interactive matrices: a semiot-ic common ground for game studies. In A. Baba (Ed.), Proceedings of the Digra 2007 Conference, pp. 466–473.
Giuliana, G, T. 2018. Quilting the meaning. Proceedings of Digra 2018.
Grodal, T.K & Lindegaard,G.A. (2008).Embodiment and interface. In Video Game Theory Reader 2. London: Routledge.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, Usa.
Marrone, G, Dusi, F and Lo Feudo, G. 2007. Narrazione ed Esperienza: intorno a una semiotica della vita quotidiana, San Giovanni: Meltemi.
Paolucci, C. 2010.Strutturalismo e Interpretazione. Milano: Bompiani.
Picard, R,W. 1997. Affective Computing. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/e526112012-054
Pinker, S. 1997. How the Mind Works. NY: Norton.
Sicart, M. 2011. Against procedurality. Game Studies, Volume 11 issue 3 December 2011.
Thibault, M. 2017. The meaning of Play. PhD Dissertation. University of Turin.
Todorov, T. 1982. La conquête de l’Amérique, la question de l’autre. Paris: Seuil.
Volli, U. 2006. È possibile una semiotica dell’esperienza?. In Marrone, G, Dusi, F and Lo Feudo, G. 2007. Narrazione ed Esperienza: intorno a una semiotica della vita quotidiana, San Giovanni: Meltemi.
