Translating the wild: AI, semiotics, and the future of animal communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33919/dasc.25.8.10Keywords:
Biosemiotics, zoosemiotics, artificial intelligence, dolphin communication, UmweltAbstract
This article critically examines the recent rise of AI-based attempts to “translate” animal communication: with a specific focus on aquatic species such as dolphins and whales. Drawing on biosemiotics, ecosemiotics, and Umwelt theory, it argues that such projects, while technologically sophisticated, risk reducing animal semiosis to codifiable data structures and computational approximations of meaning. Through an analysis of DolphinGemma and CHAT, the article exposes the epistemological and semiotic limitations of current AI models, contrasting them with embodied, context-sensitive modes of communication in non-human species. Rather than serving as transparent translation tools, AI systems should be understood as technosemiotic infrastructures which may support new interspecies resonances, provided they are embedded within critical and relational frameworks. The analysis advocates for an ecotechnical semiotics which redefines intelligence and communication as emergent, situated, and materially grounded processes, resisting both symbolic reductionism and techno-utopianism.
References
Alawijeh, M. ‘A., S. Z. Al-Mesilini. 2025. “A Comparative Study of Artificial and Natural Intelligence from Ibn Sina’s Perspective”. Journal of Ecohumanism, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2879. Available at: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6082.
Attard-Frost, A. 2024. Queering Intelligence: A THeory of Intelligence as Performance and a Critique of Individual and Artificial Intelligence. In Klipphan-Karge, M., A. Koster, A. M. dos Santos Bruss (eds.). Queer Reflections on AI. Uncertain Intelligences. London: Routledge, 23–39.
Bermant, P. C., M. M. Bronstein, R. J. Wood, S. Gero and D. F. Gruber. 2019. “Deep Machine Learning Techniques for the Detection and Classification of Sperm Whale Bioacoustics”. Scientific Report, 9, 12588. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48909-4.
Brooks, R. 1986. Achieving Artificial Intelligence through Building Robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT AI Lab.
Brooks, R. 1990. “Elephants Don’t Play Chess”. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6, 3–15.
Brooks, R. 1991. “Intelligence without Representation”. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159.
Cerrone, M., N. Mäekivi. 2021. “A Zoosemiotic Approach to the Transactional Model of Communication”. Semiotica, 242, 39–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0052.
CHAT: Is It A Dolphin Translator Or An Interface? Wild Dolphin Project. Available at: https://www.wilddolphinproject.org/our-research/chat-research/ (accessed 8 May 2025).
Clark, A. 1997. Being There. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, A., D. Chalmers. 1998. “The Extended Mind”. Analysis, Vol. 58, No. 1, 7–19. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3328150.
Deacon, T. 1997. The Symbolic Species. New York: Norton.
Delahaye, P. 2021. “Use of Quantitative Measures in Zoosemiotics: how Machines Are Becoming a New Pair of Ears and Eyes for Researchers”. Biosemiotics, Vol. 14, 287–294. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09440-0.
Dondero, M. G. 2025. “Semiotics of Artificial Intelligence: Enunciative Praxis in Image Analysis and Generation”. Semiotica, No. 262, 111–146. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2024-0195.
Emmeche, C. 2001. “Does a Robot Have an Umwelt? Reflections on the Qualitative Biosemiotics of Jakob von Uexküll”. Semiotica, Vol. 134, No. 1/4, 653–693. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2001.048.
Ghoshal, A. 2025. Google AI learns to speak dolphin. New Atlas, 15 April 2025. Available at: https://newatlas.com/biology/build-ai-translator-dolphins-dolphingemma/ (accessed 8 May 2025).
Gudwin, R. 1999. Umwelts and Artificial Devices. In da Costa, R., L. Santaella (eds.). Seminário Avançado de Comunicacao e Semiotica: Novos Modelos de Representação: Vida Artificial e Inteligência Artificial. São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica, 51– 56.
Hartley, J., I. Ibrus and M. Ojamaa. 2020. On the Digital Semiosphere: Culture, Media and Science for the Anthropocene. London: Bloomsbury.
Heinrichs, J. H. 2020. Artificial Intelligence in Extended Minds: Intrapersonal Diffusion of Responsibility and Legal Multiple Personality. In Beck, B., M. Kühler. (eds.). Technology, Anthropology, and Dimensions of Responsibility. Metzler: Stuttgart, 159–176.
Hoffmeyer, J. 1996. Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hoffmeyer, J. 2004. “Uexküllian Planmässigkeit”. Signs Systems Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1, 73–97.
Hoffmeyer, J., K. Kull. 2003. Baldwin and Biosemiotics: What Intelligence is for. In Weber, B. H., D. J. Depew. (eds.). Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 253–272.
Krzanowski, R., P. Polak, 2022. “Ontology and AI Paradigms”. Proceedings, Vol. 81, No. 1, 119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022081119.
Kull, K. 2015. “Evolution, Choice, and Scaffolding: Semiosis is Changing Its Own Building”. Biosemiotics, Vol. 8, No. 2, 223–234.
Kull, K. 2018. “Choosing and Learning: Semiosis Means Choice”. Signs Systems Studies, Vol. 46, No. 4, 452–446.
Lacková, L. 2023. “A Biosemiotic Approach to AI. Folding as Semiotic Modelling”. (translated by A. Lyubimova). Method, Vol. 3, No. 4, 147–173.
Lafferty, E. 2025. On using Google Translate to speak ‘Dolphin’ to aliens. Times of Malta, 29 March 2025. Available at: https://x2.timesofmalta.com/20250329/opinion/how-google-translate-has-allowed-us-to-speakdolphin/ (accessed 8 May 2025)
Leone, M. 2019. Otherness, Extraneoussness, and Unawareness in Inter-Cultural Semiotics. In Leone, M., B. Surace and J. Zeng. (eds.). The Waterfall and the Fountain. Comparative Semiotic Essays on the Contemporary Art in China (i saggi di Lexia, 34). Roma: Aracne, 9–29.
Leone, M. 2023. I compiti di una semiotica dell’intelligenza artificiale. In Santangelo, A., Leone, M. (eds.). Semiotica e intelligenza artificiale (i saggi di Lexia, 48). Roma: Aracne, 29–44.
Mann, J., R. C. Connor, P. L. Tyack and H. Whitehead (eds.). 2000. Cetacean Societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maran, T. 2020. Ecosemiotics: The Study of Signs in Changing Ecologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maran, T., D. Martinelli and A. Turovski (eds.). 2011. Readings in Zoosemiotics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Martinelli, D. 2011. “Let’s Get Physical! – On the Zoosemiotics of Corporeality”. Biosemiotics, 4, 259–279. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-010-9098-5.
Nine, A. 2025. New Google LLM Aims to Translate Dolphin Language. Extreme Tech, 16 April 2025. Available at: https://www.extremetech.com/science/new-google-llm-aims-to-translate-dolphin-language (accessed 8 May 2025)
Nöth, W. 2001. “Semiosis and the Umwelt of a Robot”. Semiotica, Vol. 134, No. 1/4, 695–699. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2001.049.
Nöth, W. 2003. “Semiotic Machines”. S.E.E.D. Journal, Vol. 3, 81–99.
Paolucci, C. 2025. “The Myth of Meaning: Generative AI as Language-endowed Machines and the Machinic Essence of the Human Being”. Semiotica, 262, 5–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2024-0204.
du Sautoy, M. 2019. The Creativity Code: How AI Is Learning to Write, Paint and Think. London: Fourth Estate
Sebeok, T. A. 1972. Perspective in Zoosemiotics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sebeok, T. A. 1977. How Animals Communicate. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Sebeok, T. A. (ed.). 1990. Essays in Zoosemiotics. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.
Sebeok, T. A. 2001. “Biosemiotics: Its Roots, Proliferation, and Prospects”. Semiotica, Vol. 134, No. 1/4, 61–78.
Shannon, C., W. Weaver. 1948. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Illinois: Urbana.
Sharov, A. 2013. Minimal Mind. In Swan, L. (ed.). Origins of Mind. New York: Springer, 343–360.
Sharov, A., T. Vehkavaara. 2015. “Protosemiosis: Agency with Reduced Representation Capacity”. Biosemiotics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 103–123.
Smith, J. D., J. Schull, J. Strote, K. McGee, R. Egnor and L. Erb. 1995. “The Uncertain Response in the Bottlenosed Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 124, No. 4, 391–408. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-3445.124.4.391.
Smith, J. D., W. E. Shields, J. Schull and D. A. Washburn. 1997. “The Uncertain Response in Humans and Animals”. Cognition, Vol. 62, No. 1, 75–97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00726-3.
Tønnessen, M. 2022. “The Evolutionary Origin(s) of the Umwelt”. Biosemiotics, Vol. 15, 451–455.
Uexküll, J. v. 1909. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Springer.
Uexküll, J. v. 1940. Bedeutungslehre. Leipzig: Verlag von J. A. Barth.
Vidales, C., J. Horta. 2024. “A Philosophical and Cybersemiotic Reading of Von Uexküll’s Umwelt Theory”. Biosemiotics, Vol. 17, 319–339. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-024-09572-z.
Weizenbaum, J. 1976. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co.
Zengiaro, N. 2023a. “Latour and Biosemiotics. The Hybrid Notion of Life”. E|C. Rivista dell’Associazione Italiana di Studi Semiotici, 37, 130–145.
Zengiaro, N. 2023b. “The Circulation of Meaning: A Biosemiotic Perspective on the Functional Circle”. Punctum. International Journal of Semiotics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 209–225. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.18680/hss.2023.0026.
Ziemke, T. 2001a. “The Construction of ‘Reality’ in the Robot”. Foundations of Science, Vol. 6, No. 1, 163–233.
Ziemke, T. 2001b. Are Robots Embodied? In Balkenius, C., J. Zlatev, C. Brezeal, K. Dautenhahn, H. Kozima, (eds.). Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modelling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems. Lund: Lund University Cognitive Studies, 75–83.
