The semiotic of AI images

Authors

  • Stephanie Schneider Texas Tech University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33919/dasc.25.8.5

Keywords:

AI generated images, Art, Symbolic Forms, Susanne Langer, Presentational & Discursive Symbols

Abstract

In her 1942 book Philosophy in a New Key, A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art, American philosopher Susanne K. Langer distinguishes between two symbolic forms: discursive and presentational. The former is linear, discrete, and successive, while the latter is simultaneous and relational. She describes language as a discursive form and images as presentational. Langer argues that not all meaning can be communicated by discursive symbols; in particular, emotions cannot be expressed in discrete form. Instead, they find their symbolic form in artworks. This aligns with her aesthetic theory, which she elaborates on in her book Feeling and Form (1953), where she states her main proposition that art gives form to our feelings. Her distinction between the representational capabilities of language and images is well-suited for analyzing AI-generated images. Based on Langer, we can see two symbolic forms–the discursive and the presentational–collide in the process of text-to-image generation. Here, the image, as a presentational form, is created from a discursive form, i.e. a description (prompt), which, by Langer’s definition, is incapable of communicating the same meaning as a presentational symbol. This article will explore the Semiotic of AI image generation based on her theory. The limitations of language as a discrete and linear form, and the resulting communicative constraints, are contrasted with images as presentational forms, such as artworks. This is not an evaluation of AI images, but rather an attempt to understand their structure and function within communication processes. The aim is to gain a new perspective on this medium and assess whether these images can help us “make our ideas clear“ (Charles Peirce 1878).

References

Adnan, E. 2021. Etel Adnan: Light’s New Measure. Guggenheim. Available at: https://www.guggenheim.org/exhibition/etel-adnan-lights-new-measure (accessed 4 June 2025).

Anadol, R., C. Reas, M. Kuo and P. Antonelli. 2021. “Modern Dream: How Refik Anadol Is Using Machine Learning and NFTs to Interpret MoMA’s Collection”. MoMa Magazine, 15 November 2021. Available at: https://www.moma.org/magazine/articles/658 (accessed 4 June 2025).

Anadol, R. 2022. Refik Anadol on AI, Algorithms, and the Machine as Witness. MoMa Magazine, 20 December 2022. Available at: https://www.moma.org/magazine/articles/821 (accessed 4 June 2025).

Barnard, J. 2023. What is Embedding? IBM. Available at: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/embedding (accessed 4 June 2025).

Bergmann, D., C. Stryker. 2024. What are diffusion models? IBM. Available at: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/diffusion-models (accessed 4 June 2025).

Bisanz, E. 2010. Die Überwindung des Ikonischen. Kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven der Bildwissenschaft. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

Bushwick, S. M. Twombly, A. Hobbs. 2025. “How AI Generates Images From Text”. Scientific American Magazine, Special Edition, Vol. 34, No. 1, Winter/Spring 2025, 24–25.

Droitcour, B. 2024. The Year in Review: Museums Are Leaving AI Hype Behind. FRIEZE, 10 December 2024. Available at: https://www.frieze.com/article/year-review-ai-art-2024?utm_source=FRIEZE&utm_campaign=ed5c (accessed 4 June 2025).

Eldagsen, B. 2023. “PSEUDOMNESIA III. Fake Memories of Art History”. Available at: https://www.eldagsen.com/pseudomnesia3/ (accessed 4 June 2025).

Epstein, Z., A. Hertzmann. 2023. “Art and the Science of Generative AI”. Science, Vol. 380, Issue 6650, 1110–1111, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh4451 (accessed 4 June 2025).

Foster, H., R. Krauss, Y.-A. Bois, B. Buchloh, D. Joselit. 2004. Art Since 1900: Modernism, Antimodernism, Postmodernism. London: Thames & Hudson.

Ketner, K. L. 1984. “The Early History of Computer Design: Charles Sanders Peirce and Marquand’s Logical Machines.” With the assistance of A. Stewart, The Princeton Library Chronicle, Vol. XLV, No. 3, 186–224.

Langer, S. K. 1942 [1951]. Philosophy In A New Key. A Study In The Symbolism Of Reason, Rite, And Art. 2nd edition. New York: Mentor Books.

Langer, S. K. 1953. Feeling and Form. A Theory of Art Developed From Philosophy in a New Key. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Langer, S. K. 1966. “The Cultural Importance of the Arts”. Journal of Aesthetic Education, Vol. 1, No. 1, 5–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3331349 (accessed 3 June 2025).

Manovich, L., E. Arielli. 2024. Artificial Aesthetics. Available at: https://manovich.net/index.php/projects/artificial-aesthetics (accessed 4 June 2025).

Mucci, T. 2024. The history of AI. IBM. Available at: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/history-of-artificial-intelligence (accessed 4 June 2025).

Nake, F., S. Grabowski. 2005. Zwei Weisen, das Computerbild zu betrachten. In Warnke, M., W. Coy, G. C. Tholen (eds.). 2005. HyperKult. Zur Ortsbestimmung analoger und digitaler Medien. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

O’Connor, R. 2023. How DALL-E 2 Actually Works. AssemblyAI, 29 September 2023. Available at: https://www.assemblyai.com/blog/how-dalle-2-actually-works (accessed 4 June 2025).

OpenAI. Introducing 4o Image Generation (2025). Available at: https://openai.com/index/introducing-4o-image-generation/ (accessed 3 June 2025).

OpenAI. (n.d.). DALL·E 3. Available at: https://openai.com/index/dall-e-3/ (accessed 4 June 2025).

Parshall, A. 2023. How This AI Image Won a Major Photography Competition. Scientific American, 21 April 2023. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-my-ai-image-won-a-major-photography-competition/ (accessed 3 June 2025).

Peirce, C. S. 1878. “Illustrations Of The Logic Of Science. Second Paper. How To Make Our Ideas Clear”. Popular Science Monthly, Vol. XII, 286–302.

Radford, A., J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark, G. Krueger and I. Sutskever. 2021. “Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision”. ArXiv, arXiv:2103.00020v1. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.00020 (accessed 4 June 2025).

Ramesh, A., P. Dhariwal, A. Nichol, C. Chu, M. Chen. 2022. “Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents”. ArXiv, arX iv:2204.06125v1. Available at: https://cdn.openai.com/papers/dall-e-2.pdf (accessed 4 June 2025).

Roose, K. 2022. An A.I.-Generated Picture Won an Art Prize. Artists Aren’t Happy. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/02/technology/ai-artificial-intelligence-artists.html (accessed 3 June 2025). A version of this article appears in print on Sept. 3, 2022, Section B, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: “Creating Art By Typing In Some Words”.

Siemens 2025 Tracing the AI family tree: say hello to ChatGPT’s grandmother. Available at: https://www.siemens.com/global/en/company/insights/tracing-the-ai-family-tree-say-hello-to-chatgpts-grandmother.html (accessed 4 June 2025).

Singh, A. 2022. How Does DALL·E 2 Work?. Medium, 27 April 2022. Available at: https://medium.com/augmented-startups/how-does-dall-e-2-work-e6d492a2667f (accessed 4 June 2025).

Taylor, G. D. 2014. When the Machine Made Art : The Troubled History of Computer Art. International Texts in Critical Media Aesthetics. Vol. 7. New York, London: Bloomsbury.

This Is World. 2025. Father of AI: AI Needs PHYSICS to EVOLVE. prof. Yann LeCun. YouTube, 7 March 2025. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUnFgu8kH-4&list=PL80I41oVxglJOokgsaIKw4ZJORQC0Qc_5&index=4 (accessed 3 June 2025).

Turing, A. M. 1950. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”. Mind 49, 433–460. Available at: https://courses.cs.umbc.edu/471/papers/turing.pdf (accessed 4 June 2025).

Wickelgren, I. 2023. Where Imagination Lives in Your Brain. Scientific American, 8 June 2023. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/where-imagination-lives-in-your-brain/?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=campaign&utm_campaign=TIS_051925&utm_term=the%20purpose%20of%20memories%20is%20actually%20for%20future%20planning&_kx=G7ZVzZ4uR4H437KxN8yj8ye4BK7GqvSaRqWTVZPpFmZSK7F5u8_VzERn6kKRYBxo.WEer5A (accessed 4 June 2025).

Zewe, A. 2025. AI tool generates high-quality images faster than stateof-the-art approaches. MIT News, 21 March 2025. Available at: https://news.mit.edu/2025/ai-tool-generates-high-quality-images-faster-0321 (accessed 3 June 2025).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Schneider, S. (2025). The semiotic of AI images. Digital Age in Semiotics & Communication, 8, 84–102. https://doi.org/10.33919/dasc.25.8.5