Evaluating the impact of interactive cinema in audiovisual literacy and education: An eye-tracking study

Authors

  • Giorgos Dimitriadis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
  • Katerina Gouleti Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
  • Michalis Kokonis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33919/dasc.23.6.8

Keywords:

film, interactivity, multimedia learning, eye-tracking, audiovisual literacy

Abstract

The present paper explores the use of interactive cinema in education from the perspective of young students’ responsiveness. With the use of an eye-tracker, gaze data was collected from students aged between 10-13 years who watched a short film extract, enhanced with a number of interactive elements or “hotspots” that appeared during playback. During the experiment, the eye-tracker collected data on the behavioral patterns of student participants with regard to their willingness to access the interactive elements on screen, the time they devoted to reading them, possible optimal positions of those elements, etc., also studied in relation to demographic information concerning age group, area of living, and gender of the participants. The aim of the experiment was to assess students’ responses in the context of exploring the prospects for using interactive cinema in education in order to teach elements of audiovisual literacy as well as any other cross-curricular content.

References

Alemdag, E., K. Cagiltay. 2018. “A Systematic Review of Eye Tracking Research on Multimedia Learning”. Computers & Education, Vol. 125, 413–428. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.023.

Ayres, P., J. Sweller. 2005. The Split-attention Principle in Multimedia Learning. In Mayer, R. E. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, 135–146. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.009.

Bojko, A. 2013. Eye Tracking the User Experience: A Practical Guide to Research. Rosenfeld Media.

Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, R. R. Cocking (eds.). 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (expanded edition). National Academy Press.

Cohen, K. M. 2017 [1981]. The Development of Strategies of Visual Search. In Fisher, D. F., R. A. Monty and J. W. Senders (eds.). Psychology Library Edition: Perception, Vol. 8. Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception. Routledge, 271–288.

Collins, J., M. Hammond and J. Wellington. 1997. Teaching and Learning with Multimedia. Routledge.

Dillon, A., J. Jobst. 2005. Multimedia Learning with Hypermedia. In Mayer, R. E. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, 569–588. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CB O9780511816819.035.

Dogusoy, B., K. Cagiltay. 2009. An Innovative Way of Understanding Learning Processes: Eye Tracking. In Jacko, J. A. (ed.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 5613. Human-Computer Interaction, Interacting in Various Application Domains. Springer, 94–100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02583-9_11.

Domagk, S., R. N. Schwartz and J. L. Plass. 2010. “Interactivity in Multimedia Learning: An Integrated Model”. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, No 5, 1024–1033. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.003.

Duchowski, A. 2007. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Springer.

Dyer, A. G., S. Pink. 2015. “Movement, Attention and Movies: The Possibilities and Limitations of Eye Tracking?”. Refractory: A Journal of Entertainment Media, 25. Available at: https://refractory-journal.com/dyer-pink/.

Fletcher, J. D., S. Tobias. 2005. The Multimedia Principle. In Mayer, R. E. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, 117–133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.008.

Gidlof, K., N. Holmberg and H. Sandberg. 2012. “The Use of Eye-tracking and Retrospective Interviews to Study Teenagers’ Exposure to Online Advertising”. Visual Communication, Vol. 11, No. 3, 329–345. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357212446412.

Hyona, J. 2010. “The Use of Eye Movements in the Study of Multimedia Learning”. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 20, No. 2, 172–176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.013.

Jacob, R. J. K. and K. S. Karn. 2003. Commentary on Section 4 – Eye tracking in Human-computer Interaction and Usability Research: Ready to Deliver the Promises. In Hyona, J., R. Radach and H. Deubel (eds.). The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research. Elsevier, 573–605.

Kettanurak, V. (Nui), K. Ramamurthy and W. D. Haseman. 2001. “User Attitude As a Mediator of Learning Performance Improvement in an Interactive Multimedia Environment: An Empirical Investigation of the Degree of Interactivity and Learning Styles”. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 54, No. 4, 541–583. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0457.

Kim, S.-H., Z. Dong, H. Xian, B. Upatising and J. S. Yi. 2012. “Does an Eye Tracker Tell the Truth about Visualizations?: Findings While Investigating Visualizations for Decision Making”. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 18, No. 12, 2421–2430. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.215.

Lai, M.-L., M.-J. Tsai, F.-Y. Yang, C.-Y. Hsu, T.-C. Liu, S. W.-Y. Lee, M.-H. Lee, G.-L. Chiou, J.-C. Liang and C.-C Tsai. 2013. “A Review of Using Eye-tracking Technology in Exploring Learning from 2000 to 2012”. Educational Research Review, Vol. 10, 90–115. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.10.001.

Lajoie, S. P., C. Nakamura. 2005. Multimedia Learning of Cognitive Skills. In Mayer, R. E. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, 489–504. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.031.

Majaranta, P., A. Bulling. 2014. Eye Tracking and Eye-based Humancomputer Interaction. In Fairclough, S. H., K. Gilleade (eds.). Advances in Physiological Computing. Springer-Verlag, 39–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6392-3_3.

Mayer, R. E. 2005a. Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In Mayer, R. E. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, 31–48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.004.

Mayer, R. E. 2005b. Introduction to Multimedia Learning. In Mayer, R. E. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, 1–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.002.

Mayer, R. E. 2005c. Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning: Coherence, Signaling, Redundancy, Spatial Contiguity, and Temporal Contiguity Principles. In Mayer, R. E. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, 183–200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.013.

Mayer, R. E. 2009. Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E. 2014. Multimedia Instruction. In Spector, J. M., M. D. Merrill, J. Elen and M. J. Bishop (eds.). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (4th ed.). Springer, 385–399. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_31.

Molina, A. I., O. Navarro, M. Ortega and M. Lacruz. 2018. “Evaluating Multimedia Learning Materials in Primary Education Using Eye Tracking”. Computer Standards & Interfaces, Vol. 59, 45–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.02.004.

Moreno, R., R. Mayer. 2007. “Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments”. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 19, 309–326. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2.

Neo, M., K. Neo. 2001. “Innovative teaching: Using Multimedia in a Problem-based Learning Environment”. Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 4, No. 4, 19–31. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.4.4.19.

Renkl, A., R. K. Atkinson. 2007. “Interactive Learning Environments: Contemporary Issues and Trends. An Introduction to the Special Issue”. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 19, 235–238. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9052-5.

Scheiter, K., E. Wiebe and J. Holsanova. 2009. Theoretical and Instructional Aspects of Learning with Visualizations. In Zheng, R. Z. (ed.). Cognitive effects of multimedia learning. Information Science Reference, 67–88.

Schmidt-Weigand, F. 2009. The Influence of Visual and Temporal Dynamics on Split Attention: Evidences from Eye Tracking. In Zheng, R. Z. (ed.). Cognitive Effects of Multimedia Learning. Information Science Reference, 89–107.

Sungkur, R. K., M. A. Antoaroo and A. Beeharry. 2015. “Eye Tracking System for Enhanced Learning Experiences”. Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 21, 1785–1806. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9418-0.

Takacs, Z. K., A. G. Bus. 2016. “Benefits of Motion in Animated Storybooks for Children’s Visual Attention and Story Comprehension. An Eye-tracking Study”. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7, Article 1591. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01591.

Van Gog, T., K. Scheiter. 2010. “Eye Tracking As a Tool to Study and Enhance Multimedia Learning”. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 20, No. 2, 95–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.009.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Dimitriadis, G., Gouleti, K., & Kokonis, M. (2023). Evaluating the impact of interactive cinema in audiovisual literacy and education: An eye-tracking study. Digital Age in Semiotics & Communication, 6, 145–172. https://doi.org/10.33919/dasc.23.6.8