Law Journal of New Bulgarian University
https://ojs.nbu.bg/index.php/LJNBU
<p>Law Journal of New Bulgarian University (Law Journal) was established in 2005 as the first online legal periodical in Bulgaria. It is issued by the Law Department of New Bulgarian University and has three volumes per year.</p> <p>The aim of the Law Journal is to make popular the research work of the lecturers, the PhD students and the students in the Law Master's program of New Bulgarian University. It is open to publications provided by outside authors, dedicated to topical legal issues. Another aim of the Law Journal is to serve as a platform presenting current significant events such as conferences, public discussions, seminars and newly published books with the participation of the academic staff and the students in the Law Master's program of New Bulgarian University.</p> <p>Law Journal is open access and articles are subject to prior revision. The Law Journal is indexed and referenced in CEEOL (Central and Eastern European Online Library GmbH).</p>New Bulgarian Universityen-USLaw Journal of New Bulgarian University1314-5797Initiation of Administrative Penalty Proceedings
https://ojs.nbu.bg/index.php/LJNBU/article/view/1428
<p>The study examines the individual components of the procedure for initiating administrative penalty proceedings. These elements are the proceedings for establishing administrative violations; participants, subjects, and parties to the proceedings; the course of the proceedings; the content and characteristics of the act establishing an administrative violation; the prohibition on initiating administrative penalty proceedings; and special rules for initiating administrative penalty proceedings. The publication provides a theoretical definition of the proceedings as the first, administrative, and necessary phase of the administrative penalty process, representing a set of legal actions regulated by the provisions of the Administrative Violations and Penalties Act, aimed at initiating administrative penalty proceedings by drawing up an administrative violation report, which triggers the administrative penalty imposed by the state on the offender for the unlawful act committed.</p>Raina Nikolova
Copyright (c) 2025 Law Journal of New Bulgarian University
2025-12-302025-12-30212123210.33919/ljnbu.25.2.1On the Discovery of Missed Benefit Damages, Resulting from Securing the Claim by Imposition of the Protective Measure Freezing of a Pecuniary Sum in a Bank Account
https://ojs.nbu.bg/index.php/LJNBU/article/view/1429
<p>The article presents an opinion on the selected under art. 288 of the Civil Procedure Code cassation case which asks whether the claimant should prove the damages claimed pursuant to art. 403 of the Civil Procedure Code, which constitute missed benefit damages, resulting from securing the claim by imposition of the protective measure freezing of a pecuniary sum in a bank account, and whether the presumption for the missed benefits should be based on an established beyond doubt increase of the property of the individual who incurred the above-mentioned damages.</p>Todor Kolarov
Copyright (c) 2025 Law Journal of New Bulgarian University
2025-12-302025-12-30212333710.33919/ljnbu.25.2.2On Certain Points of Discussion Regarding Relative Nullity Under Article 216 of the Tax and Social Insurance Procedure Code
https://ojs.nbu.bg/index.php/LJNBU/article/view/1430
<p>The present article examines certain hypotheses of relative nullity under Article 216 of the Tax and Social Insurance Procedure Code (TSIPC) as a means of protecting the public creditor against detrimental actions of the debtor. The provision of Article 216 TSIPC aims to ensure a balance between the interests of the state as a public creditor and the subjective rights of citizens and organizations, while at the same time guaranteeing the effective collection of public receivables. The article focuses on specific legal aspects of the institute’s nature, its prerequisites, and the legal consequences of upholding the claim, as well as its relationship with Article 135 of the Law on Obligations and Contracts (the actio Pauliana), outlining certain discussion points arising from the analyzed issue.</p>Ginka Simeonova
Copyright (c) 2025 Law Journal of New Bulgarian University
2025-12-302025-12-30212384510.33919/ljnbu.25.2.3On the Content of the Anticompetitive Effect of Exclusionary Abuses of Market Dominance According to the Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU
https://ojs.nbu.bg/index.php/LJNBU/article/view/1431
<p>The article analyses the legal framework in the Guidelines on the application of Article 102 TFEU. The aim is to clarify the content of the anticompetitive effect of exclusionary abuses of market dominance according to the more economic approach.</p>Emilia Dimitrova
Copyright (c) 2025 Law Journal of New Bulgarian University
2025-12-302025-12-30212465610.33919/ljnbu.25.2.4AI Regulatory Sandboxes in the District of Artificial Intelligence
https://ojs.nbu.bg/index.php/LJNBU/article/view/1432
<p>In 2024, two regulations were adopted that for the first time introduced the concept of a regulatory laboratory and defined its main characteristics in order to promote innovation. These are the so-called Net Zero Industry Act (NZIA)/ and AI Act. The second of them, the AI Act, introduces for the first time at the European level, the mandatory construction by the member states of regulatory laboratories in the field of artificial intelligence. This is an innovation that is not present in any other Regulations, incl. and in the GDPR.</p>Katia Vladimirova
Copyright (c) 2025 Law Journal of New Bulgarian University
2025-12-302025-12-30212576510.33919/ljnbu.25.2.5Legal Dimensions of Conflict of Interest Under the Anti-Corruption Act
https://ojs.nbu.bg/index.php/LJNBU/article/view/1433
<p>The article examines the legal framework defining the conditions, procedures, and measures for identifying and preventing conflicts of interest concerning individuals holding public office. It outlines the powers of the competent authorities and officials responsible for implementing anti-corruption measures.</p>Elena Nedyalkova
Copyright (c) 2025 Law Journal of New Bulgarian University
2025-12-302025-12-30212667810.33919/ljnbu.25.2.6Models in Legal Research: A Practical Example Exploring Models of Constitutional Justice
https://ojs.nbu.bg/index.php/LJNBU/article/view/1434
<p>This article is aimed at PhD students and other researchers who wish to use modelling in their legal research. A brief overview of the work of Max Weber and his ideal type is provided. The concept of model in the humanities and comparative legal research is explained. The article offers an example with the study of European and American models of constitutional justice today, as well as an interdisciplinary study of foreign authors on the practice of the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>Raina Georgieva
Copyright (c) 2025 Law Journal of New Bulgarian University
2025-12-302025-12-30212799110.33919/ljnbu.25.2.7Professional Boundaries in Working with Protected Persons
https://ojs.nbu.bg/index.php/LJNBU/article/view/1435
<p>Respecting professional boundaries is essential for the adequate application of protection measures to the protected person, as well as for minimizing any possibility of creating danger or exerting coercion on competent officers. In this way, a high level of confidence in the effectiveness of the Protection Program is maintained, ensuring that individuals are approached from a strictly professional and ethical perspective.</p>Stoyan Uzunov
Copyright (c) 2025 Law Journal of New Bulgarian University
2025-12-302025-12-30212929810.33919/ljnbu.25.2.8The Sentence – A Balance Between Law and Morality
https://ojs.nbu.bg/index.php/LJNBU/article/view/1436
<p>The article raises the issue of the boundary between law and morality, between legal norms and public trust.</p>Elmina Yurkina
Copyright (c) 2025 Law Journal of New Bulgarian University
2025-12-302025-12-302129910110.33919/ljnbu.25.2.9On the Authorship of Works of Literature, Art and Science Generated by Artificial Intelligence
https://ojs.nbu.bg/index.php/LJNBU/article/view/1437
<p>This paper discusses issues related to authorship of works of literature, art and science generated by artificial intelligence systems. The author discusses the legal framework of artificial intelligence systems as well as their legal nature. A comparison is made between the process of generating works by an artificial intelligence system and the creative process for natural persons. The various theories regarding in whose favour authorship of a work of literature, art and science generated by an artificial intelligence system arises are examined. Suggestions de lege ferenda are given in order to protect the copyrights of natural persons.</p>Alexander Dimitrov
Copyright (c) 2025 Law Journal of New Bulgarian University
2025-12-302025-12-3021210210910.33919/ljnbu.25.2.10