Since/Because Alternation: Insights from Clause Structures in Nigerian English
The choice between since and because allows language users to provide rationality which is part of the cognitive functions of language. Different conditions have been shown to explicate this alternation, with little attention paid to the clausal weight. The present paper shows how expression of rationality is alternated between choosing a since or because, since both have the semantic capacity to do so, in certain contexts. The study uses a simple measurement method to show the extent to which clausal weight relates to this alternation. Relying on corpus data from a well-known variety representing Nigerian English, the present study shows that the choice between since and because is related to a number of factors such as the type of text producing the usages. With 1074 usages showing such interchangeable usages extracted from academic and media text types in written Nigerian English, it is shown that, at least in the variety under examination, the choice of since over because as a rationality expresser is scarce, and that overall pattern can be predicted on the basis of certain contexts including clausal weight and ordering pattern. The scarcity of since as a rationality expresser is perhaps a reflection of interference from the local languages, which do not have semantic equivalents.
Akinlotan, M., & Housen, A. (2017). Noun phrase complexity in Nigerian English: Syntactic function and length outweigh genre in predicting noun phrase complexity. English Today, 33(3), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078416000626
Akinlotan, M. (2018). The Structural Simplification Hypothesis and the Premodifiers in Nigerian English. Anglica An International Journal of English Studies, 27(2), 58-88. https://doi.org/10.7311/0860-5734.27.2.04
Akinlotan, M. (2021). Calling a spade a shovel: a cognitive construction account of BE-relativisation. Studia Neophilologica. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2021.1980738
Altenberg, B. (2008). Clausal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica. A Journal of General Linguistics, 38(1), 20-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1984.tb00734.x
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Kortmann, B. (2000). Cause - Condition – Concession – Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043
Dancygier, B. (1998). Conditionals and prediction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486463
Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E. (2000). Usages with if, since, and because: 585 Causality, Epistemic stance and clause order. In Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Kortmann, B. (Eds.), Cause – Condition – Concession - Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives (pp. 111-142). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043-006
Diessel, H. (2001). The Ordering Distribution of Main and Adverbial Clauses: A Typological Study. Language, 77(3), 433–455. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0152
Diessel, H. (2005). Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial 593 clauses. Linguistics, 43(3), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.449
Diessel, H. (2008). Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2008.018
Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2006). A New Look at the Acquisition of Relative Clauses. Language, 81(4), 882-906. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0169
Diessel, H., & Hetterle, K. (2011). Causal clauses: A cross-linguistic investigation of their structure, meaning and use. In Siemund, Peter (Ed.), Linguistic Universals and Language Variation, 21-52. De Gruyter.
Goldberg, A. (1995). Usages: A Usage Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.
Hawkins, J. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554285
Hawkins, J. (2004). Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001
Hetterle, K. (2015). Adverbial Clauses in cross-linguistic perspective. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110409857
Hoffmann, T. & Bergs, A. (2018). A Construction Grammar Approach to Genre. CogniTextes 18. https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.1032
Kachru, B. (2019). ‘World Englishes and Culture Wars.’ In C. L. Nelson, Z. G. Proshina & D. R. Davis (Eds.), The Handbook of World Englishes (pp. 447-471). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119147282.ch25
Kanetani, M. (2005). Relations among Usages with Because: With Special Reference to Metalinguistic Uses of Because, Tsukuba English Studies, (24), 31-50.
Kanetani, M. (2006). Usages of Causation and Reasoning. Tsukuba English Studies, (25), 19-40.
Kanetani, M. (2007). Focalizations of Because and Since: Since-Clauses Can Be 622 Focalized by Certain Focusing Adverbs, Especially Since There Is No Reason to Ban It. English Linguistics, 24(2), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.24.341
Kanetani, M. (2019). Causation and Reasoning Usages. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.25
Nikiforidou, K. (2016). ‘Genre knowledge’ in a constructional framework: Lexis, grammar and perspective in folk tales. In N. Stukker, W. Spooren & G. Steen (Eds.), Genre in Language, Discourse and Cognition (pp. 331-360). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110469639-014
Rosenbach, A. (2005). Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. Language, 81(3), 613-644. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0149
Copyright (c) 2021 Mayowa Akinlotan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All published articles in the ESNBU are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
In other words, under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license users are free to
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
Attribution (by) - All CC licenses require that others who use your work in any way must give you credit the way you request, but not in a way that suggests you endorse them or their use. If they want to use your work without giving you credit or for endorsement purposes, they must get your permission first.
NonCommercial (nc) - You let others copy, distribute, display, perform, and modify and use your work for any purpose other than commercially unless they get your permission first.
If the article is to be used for commercial purposes, we suggest authors be contacted by email.
If the law requires that the article be published in the public domain, authors will notify ESNBU at the time of submission, and in such cases the article shall be released under the Creative Commons 1 Public Domain Dedication waiver CC0 1.0 Universal.
Copyright for articles published in ESNBU are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. Authors retain full publishing rights and are encouraged to upload their work to institutional repositories, social academic networking sites, etc. ESNBU is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Occasionally ESNBU may co-publish articles jointly with other publishers, and different licensing conditions may then apply.